I How Can Tensors Be Evaluated to Scalars?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalars Tensors
LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
Many descriptions of tensors define them to be these kind of multidimensional arrays of numbers, as generalizations of vectors and matrices, that transform in a certain way. But, mathematically, tensors are functions whose domains are these multidimensional arrays and whose codomains/ranges are the real numbers.

My question: Is there a general rule to evaluate any tensor, to determine the real number that is assigned to it? Perhaps by successive contractions, until it becomes a scalar?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. You cannot represent any function as a single real number (unless the domain is a single point or the function is a constant). The number depends on the arguments.
 
LarryS said:
the real number that is assigned to it?
I am not sure what you mean by this. There is a real number assigned to ##T^{\mu\nu…}a_\mu b_\nu …## but there is no number assigned to ##T^{\mu\nu…}##
 
  • Like
Likes Jaime Rudas
Dale said:
I am not sure what you mean by this. There is a real number assigned to ##T^{\mu\nu…}a_\mu b_\nu …## but there is no number assigned to ##T^{\mu\nu…}##
I think I see where you are going. I probably need to read/study this subject a little further.
 
LarryS said:
Perhaps by successive contractions, until it becomes a scalar?
That is the only way to get a scalar from a tensor, yes: by contracting it, either with itself or with appropriate other tensors, so that there are no free indexes left and you have a scalar.

What are usually called the "components" of a tensor can be viewed as contractions of that tensor with appropriate combinations of basis vectors and covectors of a particular reference frame.
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72, LarryS, Ibix and 1 other person
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top