How Can We Quantize the Celerity Operator in Lagrangian Mechanics?

eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
Let be the Lagrangian of a particle:

L(q,\dot q,t) my question is if we can get its quantizied version in the form:

p\dot q-L(q,\dot q,t)| \Psi>=E_{n}|\Psi >

of course we know how to quantizy the Momentum operator the question is..¿how do we quantizy the "celerity" \dot q operator acting over an state?..thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't write the Hamiltonian like that and still use the \dot{q}. Just as in classical Hamiltonian mechanics, you have to eliminate \dot{q} in favour of p = \partial L / \partial \dot{q}, and so you shouldn't have any "generalized velocity" (which is what you have called celerity) quantities appearing in the expression.

Just to be picky as well, I would ask that you put brackets around your operator acting on |\psi\rangle on the left-hand-side.

Alternatively, you might want to eliminate the p that you have put on the left-hand-side with the relation between p and \dot{q} given by p = \partial L / \partial \dot{q}. In this case, I guess the operator \dot{q} would be given by \hat{\dot{q}} =d \hat{x}/dt.
 
Last edited:
I was just reading the perspective on Julian Schwinger in the History of Physics section of the arxiv. It mentioned his papers on the quantum action principle in fully relativistic form. Apparently he was concerned to have a way to define relativistic QM without starting with a classical theory, quantizing it, and then throwing it away.

Has anybody looked at these papers? Can anybody comment on the methodology?
 
The problem with Hamiltonian Quantization is that in several theories you have H\Psi= 0 so there wouldn,t be any time evolution of the system..

"self-adjoint" could you give the references to the arxiv papers about Julian Schwinger?..i would like to take a look at them.
 
Well if H = 0, then by definition

\sum_{i=1}^N p_i\dot{q}_i - L(\vec{q}, \dot{\vec{q}}, t) = 0

so you will get the same problem, or have I missed something?
 
eljose said:
"self-adjoint" could you give the references to the arxiv papers about Julian Schwinger?..i would like to take a look at them.


The biography paper is at http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0606/0606153.pdf. Schwinger's own papers aren't on the arxiv; they were published in journals of the American Physical Society or Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, and those organizations are still charging for the online versions. Almost worth joining the APS ($109) to get to those great old works.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top