How Can We Simplify the Algebra in Relativistic Elastic Collision Problems?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying algebraic expressions in relativistic elastic collision problems by leveraging conservation laws. Participants suggest avoiding complex variables like p' by using conservation of energy and momentum separately. It is recommended to express momentum in terms of energy and known parameters to streamline calculations. Squaring the relevant 4-vectors can help eliminate square roots, potentially leading to a solvable quadratic equation. Overall, the emphasis is on reducing algebraic complexity while maintaining accuracy in calculations.
yup790
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



VCBC0.png

Homework Equations


et Em and pm be the energy and momentum of the mass m after the collision. Let p and p' be the momentum of mass M before and after the collision.

From conservation of 4 momentum:
\begin{bmatrix}E+m \\ p\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}E_m+E' \\ p'+p_m\end{bmatrix}

We also have our invariants
E2-p2=M2, etc.

The Attempt at a Solution


Squaring the 4-vectors we get: E^2+2Em+m^2-p^2=E'^2+2E'E_m+E_m^2-p'^2-2p_mp'-p_m^2

Using our invarients, this becomes:
M^2+m^2 + 2Em=m^2+m^2+2(E&#039;E_m-p&#039;p_m)<br /> \implies Em=E&#039;E_m-p&#039;p_m<br />

now, using the conservation of energy and momentum:
E_m=E+m-E&#039; & p_m=p-p&#039;
Substituting these in and using our invarient again gets us:
Em=E&#039;(E+m)-p&#039;p-M^2

I have tried setting p=\sqrt{E^2-M^2}however its gets so algebraically heavy. Is there an easier way??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yup790 said:
Squaring the 4-vectors we get:
You can make a stronger statement. Energy and momentum are both conserved separately. That way you can avoid p' with its ugly influence on the equations.
 
mfb said:
You can make a stronger statement. Energy and momentum are both conserved separately. That way you can avoid p' with its ugly influence on the equations.

What would I replace it with? p-pm is a bit redundant
 
p-pm is fine. Express pm in terms of Em, then replace it by E' and known parameters. Squaring it at the right place will get rid of any square roots, and then you'll probably have to solve a quadratic equation.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top