How Do Bell States Compare to Total Spin States in Quantum Mechanics?

nateHI
Messages
145
Reaction score
4
Towards the end of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAgV-LKTiMI&feature=channel" video at 54:55, the professor defines the four possible states of two entagled electrons as follows:

singlet
|0,0> = |u,d> - |d,u>
triplet
|1,1> = |u,u>
|1,0> = |u,d> + |d,u>
|1,-1> = |d,d>

where:
|u,u>, |u,d>, |d,u>, |d,d>
form the 4 dimensional basis in the space of the total spin of the two electrons.

This doesn't seem to jive with the four bell states as defiend on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_state" .

For example, the first triplet state of the total spin as defined above |1,1> is an eigenstate of the |u,u> state and doen't need to be superposed. However, every Bell State as defined by wikipedia is a superposition of two states. What am I missing?

Also, which of the four Bell States is the singlet state?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a precise mathematical definition of a "Bell state" for this particular case? If so, what is it? If not, what do you think it can be?
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top