How do branes challenge our understanding of spacetime and geometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rodsika
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacetime
rodsika
Messages
278
Reaction score
2
Branes are confusing subject. Branes are objects. Yet Branes are also Spacetime. But how could that be. General Relativity says geometry is not physical, but just math relationship. Now how could Branes itself be spacetime when Branes are objects like strings?

http://universe-review.ca/R15-18-string.htm says:

"D-branes - A D-brane is a submanifold of space-time with the property that open strings can end or begin on it. Strings can have various kinds of boundary conditions. For example closed strings have periodic boundary conditions (the string comes back onto itself)."

and

"Branes are not merely places; they are also objects that possesses finite tension and carry charges. Thus, they can be distorted and can interact with other charged objects and gravitational field"

Branes are supposed to be submanifold of spacetime. But spacetime is just an abstract mathematical idea, how could branes or spacetime submanifold contain charges?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rodsika said:
General Relativity says geometry is not physical, but just math relationship.

There is no difference in shape between the Earth and a bottle of beer?

rodsika said:
Branes are supposed to be submanifold of spacetime. But spacetime is just an abstract mathematical idea, how could branes or spacetime submanifold contain charges?!

No, they _occupy_ a submanifold of spacetime. Think eg of a rubber band stretched around a tube.

rodsika said:
http://universe-review.ca/R15-18-string.htm says:

"D-branes - A D-brane is a submanifold of space-time with the property that open strings can end or begin on it. Strings can have various kinds of boundary conditions. For example closed strings have periodic boundary conditions (the string comes back onto itself)."

This definition "where open strings can end" has created confusion without end and unfortunately has been copied all the time without illuminating anybody.

A brane is simply a certain extended classical field configuration, or solution of the equations of motions, call it soliton if you like. Depending on the boundary conditions, the fields are concentrated in certain regions ("submanifolds") of spacetime. Such branes correspond to non-perturbative sectors in the closed string theory.

A D-brane is a "dual" formulation of such a brane, for which the non-perturbative sector of closed strings is reformulated in terms of the perturbative sector of open strings. In other words, the extended soliton is transformed into a "local" degree of freedom, which in the language of conformal field theory can be represented by certain boundary conditions of open strings (namely regions "where open strings can end").

Note that D-branes are special in this and more general branes cannot be transformed to simple boundary conditions for open strings. So focusing on this "where open strings can end" does not capture the essence of branes, this is just a feature of a subclass of branes.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
this thread is to open up discussion on Gravi-GUT as theories of everything GUT or Grand Unified Theories attempt to unify the 3 forces of weak E&M and strong force, and Gravi-GUT want to add gravity. this peer reviewed paper in a journal on Gravi-GUT Chirality in unified theories of gravity F. Nesti1 and R. Percacci2 Phys. Rev. D 81, 025010 – Published 14 January, 2010 published by Physical Review D this paper is cited by another more recent Gravi-GUT these papers and research...
In LQG and LQC there are solutions called "black to white transition". I'll add some references: (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07251 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03872 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06330 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.04264 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12823 https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02691 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.07589 https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01788 https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12646 https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03027...

Similar threads

Back
Top