How do extremes of a variable affect an equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variable
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how extreme values of the variable t affect the acceleration equation a = [(at^2 - bt)/(t+c)d] + et^2/(t-c)d. When t equals 0, the value of a is determined to be 0. For t much larger than c (t >> c), the equation simplifies significantly, leading to a new expression for a. Conversely, when t is much smaller than c (t << c), the equation also simplifies, allowing for a different interpretation of a. The conversation emphasizes visualizing the effects of these extremes rather than relying solely on complex mathematical methods like the binomial theorem.
Omid
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
To get a feeling for how extremes of a variable affect an equation, suppose that the acceleration of a body is given by a = [(at^2 - bt)/(t+c)d] + et^2/(t-c)d where a,b,c,d,e are constants : (a) Determine the value of a when t=0. (b) Find the value of a when t>>c.
(c ) find the value of a when t<<c.

I tried approximation by binomial theorem but I got some meaningless equations (for me ) so I couldn't find such a feeling :biggrin:
Please help me with this problem.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rather than using an equation, just by looking at your acceleration equation try to see what happens when t >> c and t << c. If you can't visualize it, plug in actual numbers and see what happens.
 
I don't know why you would use the binomial theorem.

a= [(at^2 - bt)/(t+c)d] + et^2/(t-c)d
(Am I correct in assuming that the "a" on both sides is intended?)

Obviously, if t= 0, a= 0.

If t is "much larger than c" (t>> c) we can ignore the c added or subtracted (If you have $10000000, $1 more or less doesn't matter! On the other hand multiplying by a very small number can be important!) and write
a is very close to [(at^2 - bt)/(t)d] + et^2/(t)d = ((at-b)+et)/d= ((a+e)t-b)/d
so da= at+ et- b. (d-t)a= et-b so a= (et-b)/(d-t).

I'm going to interpret "t<< c" to mean "t is non-zero but much smaller than c but non-zero.

Now, we "ignore" the t in t-c and t+ c and have a= [(at^2 - bt)/cd] + et^2/(-c)d=
a(t^2/cd)- bt/cd+ (et^2/cd) so (1- t^2/cd)a= ((cd- t^2)/cd)a= (et^2- bt)/ce and
a= (et^2- bt)/(cd- t^2).
 
I should have written the "a" in the left hand side as capital, A. Because it is diffrent from the right hand side one.
Now, probably, I've found such a feeling.
Thanks
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top