MHB How Do Frenet Equations Relate Torsion to Time Derivatives of Position?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torsion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving an expression for torsion using Frenet equations and time derivatives of the position vector. The key equations include the definitions of the Frenet frame and the relationship between torsion and the derivatives of the position vector. Participants explore how to manipulate the Frenet equations to express torsion in terms of time derivatives, ultimately leading to the formula involving the cross product of velocity and acceleration vectors. There is uncertainty about specific steps in the derivation, particularly in transitioning between different forms of the equations. The conversation highlights the complexity of relating geometric properties of curves to their dynamic behavior through calculus.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Using Frenet equations, find an expression for the torsion in terms of time derivatives of the position vector.

The Frenet Equations are
\begin{align*}
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} &= \frac{1}{\rho}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\\
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds} &= -\frac{1}{\tau}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\\
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{n}}}{ds} &= \frac{1}{\tau}\hat{\mathbf{b}} - \frac{1}{\rho}\hat{\mathbf{u}}
\end{align*}

The torsion in terms of time derivatives is
\begin{align*}
\tau &= \frac{\dot{\mathbf{r}}\times \ddot{\mathbf{r}}\cdot\ddot{\mathbf{r}}}
{\lvert\dot{\mathbf{r}}\times \ddot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert^2}
\end{align*}

I am not sure how to go from the equations to answer though.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Couple of comments:

1. It seems to me that some authors define
$$\frac{d \mathbf{b}}{ds}=- \tau \hat{\mathbf{n}}.$$

2. In either case, you can take this equation, and dot both sides into $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ to solve for $\tau$. Then plug in from there.
 
Ackbach said:
Couple of comments:

1. It seems to me that some authors define
$$\frac{d \mathbf{b}}{ds}=- \tau \hat{\mathbf{n}}.$$

2. In either case, you can take this equation, and dot both sides into $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ to solve for $\tau$. Then plug in from there.

So \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds} = \hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot \left(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} \times\hat{\mathbf{n}} + \hat{\mathbf{u}}\times \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{n}}}{ds}\right) = -\frac{1}{\tau}\), and since \(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} = \frac{1}{\rho}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\), so the first term is zero due to \(\frac{1}{\rho} \hat{\mathbf{n}}\times \hat{\mathbf{n}} = 0\).

Then we are left with
\[
\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot \hat{\mathbf{u}}\times \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{n}}}{ds} = -\frac{1}{\tau}
\]

I am not sure how I am going to recover the time derivatives of \(r\) from the above expression.

I suppose I am making some progress now:

Torsion is defined as
\(-\frac{1}{\tau}\hat{\mathbf{n}} = \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds}\).
Let's dot both side by \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\).
\begin{align}
\frac{1}{\tau} &= -\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds}\\
&= -\rho\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}}{ds^2}\cdot \left(\hat{\mathbf{u}}\times
\rho\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}} {ds}\right)
\end{align}
Now let's write \(\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}} {ds^2}\) as
\begin{align}
\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}}{ds^2} &= \frac{d^2\mathbf{r}} {dt^2}
\left(\frac{dt} {ds}\right)^2\\
&= \frac{1} {v^2}\ddot{\mathbf{r}}
\end{align}
and substitute back into equation above.
\begin{align}
&= -\frac{\rho^2} {v^2}\ddot{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \left(\frac{\dot{\mathbf{r}}}{v}\times
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}} {ds}\right)\\
&= ?\\
&= -\ddot{\mathbf{r}} \rho\cdot \left(\dot{\mathbf{r}}
\times\rho \ddot{\mathbf{r}}\right)_t\\
&= -\ddot{\mathbf{r}}\rho \cdot\left(\dot{\mathbf{r}}
\times\rho \dddot{\mathbf{r}}\right)\\
&= \frac{(\dot{\mathbf{r}} \times\ddot{\mathbf{r}}) \cdot
\dddot{\mathbf{r}}}
{\lvert \dot{\mathbf{r}} \times\ddot{\mathbf{r}} \rvert^2}
\end{align}

What is the ? step?
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top