How do i calculate the energy lost by my catapult

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the energy lost by a catapult, one must determine the initial kinetic energy of the projectile using its mass and initial velocity, which can be derived from its height and distance traveled. It's important to assess whether energy loss occurs due to air resistance or within the catapult mechanism itself. Experiments can be conducted to find the spring constant of the catapult, allowing for the calculation of potential energy input. If the projectile is heavy and streamlined, air resistance may be minimal, simplifying the analysis. Ultimately, comparing the input energy to the kinetic energy at impact will reveal the efficiency of the catapult.
Buggsy GC
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
I Have built a catapult for a 1st year engineering assignment, I know catapult are extremely energy inefficient and my theoretical catapult calculations prove that, but i don't know how to calculate the exact energy of my projectile as it hits the ground again, I can measure the projectiles real life height, distance, weight and time but I am a bit lost on the formula to find the joules of the projectile as it land. In summery I want to be able to calculate how energy inefficient my catapult in transferring energy to its projectile.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you have a projectile, which is heavy and appears streamlined, you could model a path which ignores air resistance to get the projectile to the target. You may be able to test how much air resistance if you are able to drop test the projectile from a tall height and measure the time. Physics labs have equipment to measure this accurately.
You can calculate the initial velocity of the projectile as it leaves necessary to hit a certain distance. Knowing the mass, you can calculate initial kinetic energy. Are you wanting to know if there is energy loss to the air, or energy loss within the actual catapult? If it is the catapult, then you can do some experiments to find the spring constant, and figure out how much potential energy you are putting into it.
 
scottdave said:
If you have a projectile, which is heavy and appears streamlined, you could model a path which ignores air resistance to get the projectile to the target. You may be able to test how much air resistance if you are able to drop test the projectile from a tall height and measure the time. Physics labs have equipment to measure this accurately.
You can calculate the initial velocity of the projectile as it leaves necessary to hit a certain distance. Knowing the mass, you can calculate initial kinetic energy. Are you wanting to know if there is energy loss to the air, or energy loss within the actual catapult? If it is the catapult, then you can do some experiments to find the spring constant, and figure out how much potential energy you are putting into it.
The energy lost by the catapult, I calculated the spring constant and the theoretical time and distances I calculated are large than those in reality by a factor for 10 roughly
 
So I would assume very little air resistance, if my projectile is heavy, relative to its size, and smooth (something like a small steel ball). Then based on height and distance, you should be able to fit a parabola and calculate what the initial velocity is. from that you can calculate initial kinetic energy. Figure how much energy you put in (1/2)*k*x^2, then find the difference.
 
  • Like
Likes Buggsy GC
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top