How do I plot this probability density over time?

baouba
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Here's the question: http://imgur.com/N60qRmw

I normalized the wave function and got A = sqrt(315/8L^9)

but how would I plot representative snapshots if the exponential factor will cancel when I square it? It's not a mixed state so it shouldn't depend on time as far as I can tell. Should I use a Fourier series? I'm just at a loss as to how to plot different instances in time if the complex term should cancel out when taking the square modulus. I feel like I might not have a complete understanding of the wave function or pure/mixed states. Could someone help clear this up?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That wavefunction is not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, so it must evolve in time. You will need to project that wavefunction onto the wavefunctions for the energy eigenstates to determine an expression for ##\psi(x,t)##.
 
fzero said:
That wavefunction is not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, so it must evolve in time. You will need to project that wavefunction onto the wavefunctions for the energy eigenstates to determine an expression for ##\psi(x,t)##.

How can you tell if a given wave function isn't an eigenstate of the hamiltonian? I just don't get how if |Ψn(x, y)|^2 = |Anψn(x)e^-iEnt/h-bar|^22 and Ψ is a pure state, how doesn't the exponential factor cancel out in 1 = ∫ |Ψn(x, y)|2 dx ?
 
baouba said:
How can you tell if a given wave function isn't an eigenstate of the hamiltonian?

The most direct way would be to just compute ##\hat{H} \psi##. If the result is not ##\lambda \psi##, where ##\lambda## is a constant, then ##\psi## is not an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian.

I just don't get how if |Ψn(x, y)|^2 = |Anψn(x)e^-iEnt/h-bar|^22 and Ψ is a pure state, how doesn't the exponential factor cancel out in 1 = ∫ |Ψn(x, y)|2 dx ?

The time-dependent wavefunction ##\psi(x,t)## will be a linear combination of the energy eigenstates. When you compute ##|\psi(x,t)|^2##, you will find cross-terms where the exponents do not cancel.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top