How Do I Prove That the Limit of \( n!^{n^{-n}} \) Equals 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bomba923
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
To prove that the limit of \( n!^{n^{-n}} \) equals 1, start by letting \( y = (n!)^{n^{-n}} \) and taking the natural logarithm, resulting in \( \ln y = \frac{\ln(n!)}{n^n} \). The next step involves evaluating the limit of the right-hand side as \( n \) approaches infinity, which can be done using L'Hôpital's rule or by recognizing that \( n^n \) grows faster than \( \ln(n!) \). This leads to the conclusion that the limit \( L \) of \( \ln y \) approaches 0. Finally, substituting back gives \( y = e^L \), confirming that the limit is indeed 1.
bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
How do I show that \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {n!} \right)^{\left( {n^{ - n} } \right)} = 1 ?

(The n^-n forces the value to decrease faster than n! increases, I believe. But how to work out that?)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1)Firstly we'll let the expression (n!)^(n^-n)=y, then taking ln on both sides give,
lny=ln(n!)/n^n.
2) We'll then find the limit of the expression at the RHS using Le Hopital's rule or by observation that n^n increases faster than ln(n!). =)
3) After finding the limit, L, all we have to do is substitute back the value of y, which is e^L
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top