How Do Kinetic and Potential Energy Differ in Physics?

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy (KE) is represented by the formula (1/2)m(u^2), while potential energy (PE) is not equal to KE but rather related through the conservation of energy principle, where PE + KE remains constant. The discussion highlights the role of acceleration and centripetal force in understanding the relationship between these energy types. At the lowest point of motion, potential energy can be set to zero, simplifying the equation to show that KE equals (1/2)mv_0^2. The clarification provided emphasizes that the total mechanical energy is conserved, leading to a better understanding of the dynamics involved. This distinction between KE and PE is crucial in physics for analyzing motion and energy transformations.
girlwhoneedsmathhelp
Messages
7
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
I saw this in my school textbook and have no idea how they manage to get this equation :

The context is Circular Motion :
"A particle on a string, w(angular velocity) varies throughout the motion. As you saw earlier, the value of w at any instant is given by the energy equation, which in this case is :
(1/2)m(r^2)(w^2) + mgr(1+cos(theta)) = (1/2)m(u^2) where u is the speed of the particle at the lower point."

Thank You!
Relevant Equations
1/2mv^2
mrw^2
I know that (1/2)m(u^2) is KE and initially I thought this showed PE=KE but I don't think so anymore...
I believe this has something to do with acceleration and Centripetal force but I'm so so confused
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can make sense of this if the configuration is like this (##+## and ##-## represent the sign of ##\cos\theta##):
20200726_141000.jpg
 
girlwhoneedsmathhelp said:
I thought this showed PE=KE
No, it shows PE+KE=constant.
It might be clearer if we use the subscript 0 for values at the lowest point and v for the speed at any instant. So their u is my v0.
Then we have rω=v, at all times, and PE+KE=##\frac 12mr^2\omega^2 + mgr(1+\cos(\theta))=\frac 12mv^2 + mgr(1+\cos(\theta))##.
At the lowest point, ##\theta=\pi##, the PE is zero (by choice) and the KE is ##\frac 12mv_0^2##, so ##\frac 12mr^2\omega^2 + mgr(1+\cos(\theta))=\frac 12mv_0^2##.
 
Ah yes I see thank you both!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top