How Do Neutrino Oscillations Relate to the Schrödinger Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jennyjones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrinos
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a high school student's inquiry about neutrino oscillations and their relation to the Schrödinger equation. The student shares their initial attempts at solving the problem, specifically focusing on the Hamiltonian and eigenstates. They receive guidance on using the time-independent Schrödinger equation and the importance of defining probabilities in quantum states. The conversation highlights the student's progress in solving parts of the problem while seeking clarification on specific concepts like the norming condition and the definitions of variables involved. Overall, the exchange emphasizes the collaborative effort in understanding complex quantum mechanics concepts.
jennyjones
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I'm a high school student from Europe and my final paper is on Neutrino oscillations.

I practiced some basic quantum states(qbit), but i find it much harder for this neutrino problem.

I translated it in hope that some of you could give me some pointers. I left some parts of the theory(not needed to solve eq's) out so hope it is still clear.

I ATTACHED IT!

I hope someone can help,

thanx

jenny
 

Attachments

  • phy.png
    phy.png
    19.1 KB · Views: 552
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jenny!

Could you please post the Hamiltionian you are studying?

Also, what have you worked out up now ("The attempt at a solution")?
 
Hey drClaude,

There is given that we start with an statonairy eigenstate of the Hamiltonian,

H|v1} = E1|v1}

I will try to scan in how i tried the problem
 
Last edited:
for a: this is what i have so far(attachment)

and then i would fill in a(0)=1

so,

1=a(t)*e^0=a(t)
a(t)=1
 

Attachments

  • ant.png
    ant.png
    16.2 KB · Views: 502
Last edited:
jennyjones said:
Hey drClaude,

There is given that we start with an statonairy eigenstate of the Hamiltonian,

H|v1} = E1|v1}

I will try to scan in how i tried the problem

I see, you are not told what the Hamiltonian looks like!

Your start is good, although I don't see why you are considering that the wave function is a two-component vector.

To continue, you should use the initial condition for ##a##, and probably also the time-independent Schrödinger equation in the quote above.
 
Thanx! I'm not sure why i used the two component vector... but i see your point it;s unnecessary
as there is only one component

i don;t get tho what I'm suppost to do with the time-independent Schrödinger equation from the quote
 
jennyjones said:
i don;t get tho what I'm suppost to do with the time-independent Schrödinger equation from the quote
What is the right-hand-side of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation?
 
H|ψ(t)}?
is that equal to H|v1}

I don't get tho why i just can't say after i found a(t)=a_0 e^(-i(A/h_bar)t)
with the given condition condition a(0)=1

1=a*e^(0)=a

so a(t)=1

hmmm, maybe i have to take a better look at your hint before i keep asking questions

i will gve it an other go
 
jennyjones said:
H|ψ(t)}?
is that equal to H|v1}
$$
i \hbar \frac{\partial | \psi(t) \rangle}{\partial t} = \hat{H} \psi(t) = \hat{H}( a(t) | \nu_1 \rangle) = a(t) \hat{H}| \nu_1 \rangle
$$

jennyjones said:
I don't get tho why i just can't say after i found a(t)=a_0 e^(-i(A/h_bar)t)
with the given condition condition a(0)=1
You have two unknowns in there that need to be determined, ##a_0## and ##A##. This is done using the equation I just wrote above and the condition that ##a(0) = 1##.
 
  • #10
thanx DrClaude,

i'm going to give it another try!
 
  • #11
this is what i have so far
 

Attachments

  • Naamloos.png
    Naamloos.png
    12.1 KB · Views: 468
Last edited:
  • #12
Great, you have solved the first part:
$$
a(t) =e^{-i E_1 t / \hbar}
$$
You can move on to B.
 
  • #13
YEY! thanx
 
  • #14
is it ok if i used the norming conditing to solve b?
 

Attachments

  • Scan0003.jpg
    Scan0003.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 460
  • #15
no longer upside down
 

Attachments

  • Scan0003.jpg
    Scan0003.jpg
    30 KB · Views: 486
  • #16
jennyjones said:
is it ok if i used the norming conditing to solve b?
I think you have to.

In part B, it is not clear what ##\alpha## and ##\beta## are. I know what you mean, but I don't think it is a rigourous way of solving the problem. You should start by the definition of the probability of finding the system in a given state.

I will have a look at part C later.
 
  • #17
I see what you mean with alpha and beta

thanx!
 
  • #18
I think i solve c, or almost solved c

the thing I'm a bit worried about is that in my answer i get a -sin(alpha)

Btw i mistyped the assignment of c, the condition is |ψ(0)} = |v(μ)}
(instead of |ψ(0)} = |v(e)})
 

Attachments

  • Scan0001.jpg
    Scan0001.jpg
    9.7 KB · Views: 435

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K