How do photon-electron transitions relate to frequency and motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SdogV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Growth Motion
SdogV
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
So, now I look at a peculiar situation with light photon motion and growth.. Can anyone comment on this thought?

Assume frequency is VERY important.

Then, E=Mc^2 might imply

E- M A'cf where
(a) A' is meters squared per sec, i.e., m^2/t (lower case m is meters!) and
(b) f is frequency, i.e., 1/t
(c) c is light velocity, m/sec

such that c^2 is identical in units to A'cf, i.e. (m^2/sec)(1/sec)(m/sec) =(m^2/sec^2)

So the ubiquity of photon-electron transitions lie in A' and f!
If A'f = c, then c^2 implies A'f =c. But if not, strange things come out of this..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SdogV said:
So, now I look at a peculiar situation with light photon motion and growth.. Can anyone comment on this thought?

Assume frequency is VERY important.

Then, E=Mc^2 might imply

E- M A'cf where

How does one "imply" the other? What's the direct derivation from one to the other. It seems as if you simply made it up. And not only that, you're mixing the units with the symbol of the variable. This is very strange.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
How does one "imply" the other? What's the direct derivation from one to the other. It seems as if you simply made it up. And not only that, you're mixing the units with the symbol of the variable. This is very strange.

Correction:
So the ubiquity of photon-electron transitions might lie in A' and f!
IF A'f = c^2, then small areas per unit time imply a high frequency, while large areas per unit time imply a small frequency.. Strange things come out of this when applied to mass "lifetimes" times frequency, i.e. (Kg/sec)(1/sec) = Kg.
 
SdogV said:
ZapperZ said:
How does one "imply" the other? What's the direct derivation from one to the other. It seems as if you simply made it up. And not only that, you're mixing the units with the symbol of the variable. This is very strange.

Correction:
So the ubiquity of photon-electron transitions might lie in A' and f!
IF A'f = c^2, then small areas per unit time imply a high frequency, while large areas per unit time imply a small frequency.. Strange things come out of this when applied to mass "lifetimes" times frequency, i.e. (Kg/sec)(1/sec) = Kg.

You never answered my question. What allows you to make the equality "A'f = c^2"? Physics doesn't involve making things up as you go along.

Please review the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=5374" before proceeding any further. You only have one chance left to address this clearly before this thread is closed.

Zz
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top