I How Do Quantum Equations Predict Outcomes in Research?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter stef3679
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
stef3679
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
How to use quantum mechanics' equations for predictions?
Hello,
I was always wondering how in research centres scientists are able to apply quantum mechanics' equations to predict an outcome. I mean, let's say you do an experiment and then collect the results, how can someone use quantum mechanics to predict the outcome ,if he can? For example,in semiconductors they've used Quantum mechanics to predict the outcome. Maybe this is a silly question,but I don't know the answer. All answers greatly appreciated,thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stef3679 said:
Summary: How to use quantum mechanics' equations for predictions?

Hello,
I was always wondering how in research centres scientists are able to apply quantum mechanics' equations to predict an outcome. I mean, let's say you do an experiment and then collect the results, how can someone use quantum mechanics to predict the outcome ,if he can? For example,in semiconductors they've used Quantum mechanics to predict the outcome. Maybe this is a silly question,but I don't know the answer. All answers greatly appreciated,thank you!

In principle, QM is no different in this respect from any other branch of physics. You have a system modeled by QM. The mathematics of QM implies (or predicts) something about that system. You run an experiment to see what happens. And, if the experiment and the theory match then all well and good.

For example, QM can model a hydrogen atom and predicts that the binding energy is ##13.6 eV##. You then do an experiment to ionise a hydrogen atom and if it takes ##13.6 eV## to achieve this then experiment matches theory.
 
Are you asking, "If quantum mechanics is statistical, so you can only calculate the probability of a given outcome, how do they no if an experiment gives a valid result?"

If so then the answer is that they repeat the experiment many times, interpreting the results statistically.
 
All of you covered me with your answers thank you very much!
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
232
Views
20K
Replies
65
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
165
Back
Top