How Do S-Parameters Affect Attenuation in WG Transitions and Circulators?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lennybogzy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Attenuation measurements in a waveguide setup can vary significantly between ports, with differences of up to 1dB observed. The discussion highlights the potential influence of S-parameters, particularly S21 and S11, on these discrepancies, suggesting that transitions and circulators may be the culprits. While insertion loss is zeroed out during measurements, variations in VSWR and mismatch loss could still impact the readings. The conversation emphasizes the need to analyze S-parameters to identify which components are causing the inconsistencies. Understanding mismatch loss is crucial for correlating these attenuation measurements effectively.
lennybogzy
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
I was hoping someone might have some insight as to how I can correlate some attenuation measurements.

Here is my setup:

I have a KU-band CW source going into a 3-port switch, into 3 semi-rigid SMA's into 3 waveguide transitions, into 3 circulators, into 3 long pieces of waveguide. On the back end the three go into 3 more sets of circulators, transitions, SMA's and then back into a switch on which I have a power meter.

I can then switch between the three different paths and measure 3 DUT's, one at a time.

The issue that I have is that I have different attenuation measurements from port to port. Some can differ by as much as 1dB.

Here is my question:

I'm pretty sure it is the transitions and/or the circulators that are causing this port to port deviation. What should I look at in terms of the s-parameters of the transitions and/or circulators to see which ones are giving me this headache, which ones to pair together, etc. What would give me the greatest insight?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
You should look at the S21. If you want to know the loss between transitions, just measure it on a network analyzer, however this could get tricky in terms of calibrating on a VNA though.
 
I understand the importance of looking at the loss. However, when I take my attenuation readings, I zero-out the insertion loss of each port every time. Therefore, I would expect that the loss in the transitions shouldn't affect my attenuation readings, even if they're all different because it just gets offset. My feeling is that maybe this has to do with s11. Anyone have any input as to how VSWR interactions would affect attenuation readings (after insertion loss is zeroed)?

Hypothetical example: I connect waveguide to waveguide, REL my power meter so it reads 0.00dB in each port.

Then I put in some sort of pad or coupler or whatever. 1 port reads 5.2dB one reads 4.8dB and another reads 4.43dB. What could cause this.
 
Last edited:
When you say you get 5.2 dB and another reads 4.8 dB, are you saying you have 2 identical pad/coupler/whatever? It could be just variations along between one device to another.

There is something call mismatch loss and it related to S11, ML = 10 \log_{10} (1-|\rho|^2).
 
Right, what I mean is if I take the same one and move it from port to port, I'll have these different readings.

I'll look into mismatch loss, thanks.
 
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Back
Top