How Do Term Symbols Apply to Magnesium's Ground State Configuration?

AI Thread Summary
Magnesium has a ground state configuration of [Ne] 3s^2, indicating it is a two-electron atom. The possible term values for magnesium include spin multiplicities of S = 1 or 0, leading to 2S+1 values of 3 or 1. The total angular momentum J can be calculated using quantum mechanics formulas, but there was confusion regarding the correct value. Participants discussed the proper notation for term symbols, emphasizing the format ^{2S+1}L_J. Clarifications were provided, and one user mentioned they had resolved their confusion with help from a chemist.
bman!!
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Sodium, = 11, has the ground state configuration [Ne] 3s^1 and is a “one
electron” atom. Magnesium, Z= 12, is a “two-electron” atom. Write down its
ground state configuration and possible term values.

i think i get the right answer but I am having a couple of issues:

my answer:

ground state configuration: [Ne] 3s^2

possible term values are for the spin multiplicity either S = 1 or 0 so 2S+1 = 3 or 1

L = 0 therefore = 0

therefore J = 1 or 3

however I am inclined to go with J = 1 as i think the exclusion plays a role.

p.s. ill happily clarify anything here as i know its not the clearest, i just don't know how to wrie term/spectroscopic notation in latex/html

cheers

i just find this term symbol stuff abit cinfusing
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, your J - value is wrong.

Tell me, what is the formula for adding two angular momentums in quantum mechanics. i.e What is the formula for J in this case?

This is the way to write a Term:

^{2S+1}L_J

Just click on this image to see the Tex-code, you should figure out how to chage the code to fit your needs-

Also, this is wrong:

"ground state configuration: [Ne] 3s^2"
We were discussing Mg right?
 
malawi_glenn said:
No, your J - value is wrong.

Tell me, what is the formula for adding two angular momentums in quantum mechanics. i.e What is the formula for J in this case?

This is the way to write a Term:

^{2S+1}L_J

Just click on this image to see the Tex-code, you should figure out how to chage the code to fit your needs-

Also, this is wrong:

"ground state configuration: [Ne] 3s^2"
We were discussing Mg right?


its ok i spoke to a chemist and he set me straight. besides, I've already had that exam, so i can set about forgetting everything i learned ;)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top