How do we pick where to set electric potential equal to zero?

AI Thread Summary
Setting electric potential to zero can be done at infinity or at the origin, depending on the problem's context. Generally, infinity is a common choice, but it may not apply if dealing with infinitely large charged objects, as their potential does not diminish at great distances. The zero potential is an arbitrary choice made during integration of the electric field, allowing for flexibility in calculations. In cases like an infinite charged plane, the concept of infinity becomes irrelevant, and the potential can be defined as zero at the plate itself. Ultimately, the choice of reference point for zero potential is determined by convenience and the specific charge configuration involved.
jerro
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Sometimes we set potential to equal zero at infinity, other times at the origin. What's the general rule of thumb here-how do I know which to choose when doing a problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You generally pick a point where the potential is zero. Infinity usually works, but the potential may not go to zero at infinity if the charged object is infinitely large. Think how the electric field does not diminish as you travel away from an infinite charged plane.
 
aftershock said:
You generally pick a point where the potential is zero.
With respect, the only reason for potential being zero at any point is because you've chosen it to be so. Specifically, you choose the arbitrary constant when you integrate the field strength due to the charge configuration in such a way as to make the potential zero at a point of your choice. Choosing that point to be a very way from your charge configuration ('at infinity') makes formulae for potential easier than otherwise.

The example of the infinite plate is interesting. A point 'at infinity' has no meaning in this case. Might as well call the plate's potential zero. But note that there are no infinite plates in practice!
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top