How Do You Calculate Electric Field Strength and Direction?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field strength and direction at a specified point, the individual electric fields from each charge must be determined using the formula E=(k⋅q)/r². The x and y components of the electric field from the negative charge need to be calculated using unit vectors, which requires the correct angle derived from the distance to the point. The net electric field is found by summing the x and y components of the electric fields from both charges. It is crucial to account for the negative sign of the charge when calculating the electric field direction. The correct approach leads to a net electric field strength of 9700 N/C, with the direction specified as an angle from the positive x-axis.
miyayeah
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The diagram is attached. What is the strength of the electric field at the position indicated by the dot in Figure 1? What is the direction of the electric field at the position? Specify the direction as an angle measured clockwise from the positive x axis.

Homework Equations


E=(k⋅q)/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


To solve the first question, I calculated for the individual electric fields from each charge on the point:

E+ = [(8.99⋅109NM2/C2)(3⋅10-9C)] / (0.05m)2
= 10788 N/C

E- = [(8.99⋅109NM2/C2)(6⋅10-9C)] / (0.111803m)2]
= 4315 N/C

(0.111803 is from applying trig to the distance between the charges and point.)

Then I found the angle between the line on the y-axis and the line connecting the negative charge to the point:

Θ= tan-1(0.05/0.1) = 26°
Θ (between imaginary line on x-axis (to the right from negative charge) to the line connecting the negative charge to the point) = 90-26° = 63°

Then I tried to solve the x and y components of the electric field of the negative charge:

(cosΘ)(4315N/C) = 1929 N/C
(sinΘ)(4315N/C) = 3859 N/C

Since there is only x component for the positive charge and to solve for the net electric field at that point, I did:

√((1929 N/C + 10788 N/C)2+(3859N/C)2)

I did not get the answer to the question despite trying out these steps. The correct answer is 9700 N/C. Without knowing the first half of the question I don't think I am able to answer the next half (the direction). Any help would be appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Pr_4.jpg
    Pr_4.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 3,505
Physics news on Phys.org
miyayeah said:
Then I found the angle between the line on the y-axis and the line connecting the negative charge to the point:

Θ= tan-1(0.05/0.1) = 26°
Θ (between imaginary line on x-axis (to the right from negative charge) to the line connecting the negative charge to the point) = 90-26° = 63°
The problem is that this is not the angle of the electric field vector. The angle is found from the components of the electric field vector, not the distances to the charges. You should first find the x and y components of each vector and add up those components. What do you get when you do this?
 
NFuller said:
The problem is that this is not the angle of the electric field vector. The angle is found from the components of the electric field vector, not the distances to the charges. You should first find the x and y components of each vector and add up those components. What do you get when you do this?
The electric field vector of the positive charge only has an x component, which I already have calculated. However I am not quite sure how I would find the x and y components of the electric field from the negative charge if I do not have any information about an angle in the first place.
 
miyayeah said:
However I am not quite sure how I would find the x and y components of the electric field from the negative charge if I do not have any information about an angle in the first place.
The most direct way is to not worry about finding the angle first and write everything in terms of unit vectors instead. Remember the Electric field vector is given by
$$\mathbf{E}=k\frac{q}{r^{2}}\hat{r}$$
##\hat{r}## is the unit vector telling you the direction of the electric field. In this case ##\hat{r}## points along the hypotenuse of the triangle created by the two charges and the dot. To find ##\hat{r}## you need to take the components of the vector ##\mathbf{r}## and divide them by the length of ##\mathbf{r}##.
$$\hat{r}=\frac{\mathbf{r}}{|\mathbf{r}|}=\frac{5\hat{x}+10\hat{y}}{\sqrt{5^{2}+10^{2}}}=0.447\hat{x}+0.894\hat{y}$$
Now that you have ##\hat{r}## what is the electric field produce by the -6.0nC charge at the location of the dot?
 
NFuller said:
The most direct way is to not worry about finding the angle first and write everything in terms of unit vectors instead. Remember the Electric field vector is given by
$$\mathbf{E}=k\frac{q}{r^{2}}\hat{r}$$
##\hat{r}## is the unit vector telling you the direction of the electric field. In this case ##\hat{r}## points along the hypotenuse of the triangle created by the two charges and the dot. To find ##\hat{r}## you need to take the components of the vector ##\mathbf{r}## and divide them by the length of ##\mathbf{r}##.
$$\hat{r}=\frac{\mathbf{r}}{|\mathbf{r}|}=\frac{5\hat{x}+10\hat{y}}{\sqrt{5^{2}+10^{2}}}=0.447\hat{x}+0.894\hat{y}$$
Now that you have ##\hat{r}## what is the electric field produce by the -6.0nC charge at the location of the dot?
To find the x component,
E=[(8.99⋅109Nm2/C2)(6⋅10-9C)(0.447)] / (√0.052+0.12m)2
= 1928.8944 N/C

To find the y component,
E=[(8.99⋅109Nm2/C2)(6⋅10-9C)(0.894)] / (√0.052+0.12m)2
= 3857.7888 N/C

However, despite using these values, I still get the same answer as my first attempt:
xnet= 10788 N/C +1928.8944 N/C
ynet= 3857.7888 N/C

Enet = √(3857.78882N/C+107882N/C) = 13289 N/C.
 
You are missing the negative sign on ##q##. Including it gives the field from the negative charge as
$$\mathbf{E_{-}}=-1928.89\text{N/C}\;\hat{x}-3857.79\text{N/C}\;\hat{y}$$
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top