How Do You Calculate Forces on a Crate on an Inclined Plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikstykal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the forces on a crate on an inclined plane, a free body diagram (FBD) is essential for visualizing the forces acting on the crate. The normal force can be derived using the equations of motion, resulting in N = Fsinθ + mgcosθ when the acceleration in the y-direction is zero. The acceleration in the x-direction can be expressed as ax = -μ(Fsinθ + mgcosθ) + Fcosθ - mgsinθ, simplifying the analysis of motion along the incline. There is a discussion about the orientation of the FBD, with some suggesting that aligning it with the physical arrangement could simplify calculations. Overall, the calculations and reasoning presented appear to be correct, emphasizing the importance of proper diagram orientation in physics problems.
Nikstykal
Messages
29
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Crate of mass m is pushed horizontally with force F up an inclined plane of θ from ground. The plane has a friction coefficient of μ.

a) draw free body diagram of crate
b) derive expression for normal force
c) derive expression for acceleration

*** Use ONLY m, g, F, μ, θ ****

Homework Equations


ΣF = ma
|a| = √(ax2+ay2)

The Attempt at a Solution


w8KETdD.png
[/B]
Included is a picture of the problem with my free body diagram.

I set the normal as the y-axis so that when solving ΣFy=may I can set ay=0.

ΣFx=max=-μN+Fcosθ-mgsinθ
ΣFy=may=N-Fsinθ-mgcosθ

ay=0 so N = Fsinθ+mgcosθ (part b)

Since ay=0, a=√ax2 = ax. Substituting N into ax:
max=-μ(Fsinθ+mgcosθ)+Fcosθ-mgsinθ

is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks correct.
 
Looks correct to me as well although I would have drawn the fbd at the same angle. Nothing wrong with yours it just look odd.
 
CWatters said:
Looks correct to me as well although I would have drawn the fbd at the same angle. Nothing wrong with yours it just look odd.
If you do that then you will have two components of acceleration (in the x AND y direction) and so your definition of N would involve more variables than the ones they allow, or at least would involve a lot more manipulation to isolate N.
 
Nikstykal said:
If you do that then you will have two components of acceleration (in the x AND y direction) and so your definition of N would involve more variables than the ones they allow, or at least would involve a lot more manipulation to isolate N.
mfb was only commenting on the orientation of the FBD. You can draw it with the same orientation as the physical arrangement but still choose the X and Y axes as parallel and normal to the plane.
 
Oh... my bad
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top