How Do You Calculate Investment Percentage Changes Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter grandnat_6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loss
AI Thread Summary
To calculate investment percentage changes, the percentage change is always relative to the initial amount. A decrease from $10,000 to $9,500 represents a 5% loss, calculated as ($9,500 - $10,000) / $10,000. Conversely, an increase from $9,500 to $10,000 reflects a 5.26% gain, calculated as ($10,000 - $9,500) / $9,500. Both calculations yield correct results but differ because they reference different starting points. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurately assessing investment performance.
grandnat_6
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I think I confused myself. Must be working too hard or something.

I trying to find the percentage gain or loss of an investment.

example:

1. orginal investment $10000.00 today $9,500.00

9,500.00/10,000.00 = .95*100 = 95%

Therefore I have 95% of my orginal amount or (100%-95%)= 5% loss.

10,000.00*-5%= -500

10,000.00-500= 9,500.00

Or:

10,000.00-9,500.00= 500.00

500.00/9,500.00= .05263*100=5.263%

9500*5.263=500

500+9,500.00= 10,000.00

Please straighten me out on this! They both seem to get me the correct answer but the percentages are different, which one is correct?

What if I started out with $9,500.00 and today it's $10,000.00?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
grandnat_6 said:
Hi,

I think I confused myself. Must be working too hard or something.

I trying to find the percentage gain or loss of an investment.

example:

1. orginal investment $10000.00 today $9,500.00

9,500.00/10,000.00 = .95*100 = 95%

Therefore I have 95% of my orginal amount or (100%-95%)= 5% loss.

10,000.00*-5%= -500

10,000.00-500= 9,500.00

Or:

10,000.00-9,500.00= 500.00

500.00/9,500.00= .05263*100=5.263%

9500*5.263=500

500+9,500.00= 10,000.00

Please straighten me out on this! They both seem to get me the correct answer but the percentages are different, which one is correct?

What if I started out with $9,500.00 and today it's $10,000.00?

Thanks.


UIt is not the same way up as way down in percentages:

if you began with $10,000.00 and after some time you have $9, 500.00 then you've lost 5% of your original invesment, as
$$\frac{9,500}{10,000}=0.05\Longrightarrow 0.05\cdot 100 \%=5\%\,\,\text{loss}$$
as the final amount is less than the first one.

Had you begun with $9,500.00 and after some time you had $10,000,, then you'd have won
$$\frac{10,000}{9,500}=1.05263\Longrightarrow (1-1.05263)\cdot 100\%=5.6263\%\,\,\text{profit}$$

DonAntonio
 
The "percentage change" is always relative to the initial amount. Going from 10000 to 9500 is a decrease of 500 so a percentage change of -500/10000= -.05 or -5% of 10000.

But an increase from 9500 up to 10000 is an increase of 500 and so a percentage change of 500/9500= .0526 or 5.26%.
 
Thanks for the help! I understand now.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top