How Do You Calculate the Third Force in Static Equilibrium?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the third force in static equilibrium, two forces were given: F1 = 2.156N at 48 degrees and F2 = 4.508N at 203 degrees. The cosine law and sine law were applied to find the magnitude and direction of the third force, resulting in an initial calculation of 2.7117N and an angle of 19.634 degrees. The approach was refined by breaking the forces into x and y components, leading to a new angle of 183.366 degrees for the equilibrant force. Ultimately, the confusion arose from calculating the reactant force instead of the equilibrant force, which was clarified with assistance from others in the discussion.
starfish101
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have been given two forces and have to calculate the magnitude and direction of the third force that will result in equilibrium. The two forces I have been given are:

F1 = 2.156N at 48 degrees
F2 = 4.508N at 203 degrees

Homework Equations



I used both the cosine law (c^2 = a^2 + b^2 -2abcosC) and the sine law (sin A/a = sin C/c) to solve the problem.

The Attempt at a Solution



I started by drawing out the triangle with all the forces and angles. I then used the equation c^2 = a^2 + b^2 -2abcosC and got an answer of 2.7117N. Next, I used the sine law to find that the angle is 19.634 degrees. I think I have to calculate theta next, but I am really confused on how to do that. I am not completely sure that I have drawn my triangle correctly either. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solving problem is not that hard. You may use the cosine law and the sine law, but it might be lots of algebra. For me, I would like to write components of force in x and y direction. The force in each component must be canceled ( forces are balance)

So you have two unknown variables ( F3 and its angle) with two equations (forces in x and y direction), you can solve it.

Is it clear?
 
I think I know what you mean. I just redid the equation by breaking the two vectors up into two right angle triangles. After I found the two x and y components, I drew a new triangle. My equilibriant force was still 2.7117N but my angle came to 183.366 degrees. The angle seems really strange to me considering the larger force is in the same quadrant. Am I still doing something incorrectly? Thanks a lot for your help so far.
 
Never mind - I just figured out what I did wrong. I calculated the reactant force and not the equilibrant force. Thanks so much for all your help!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top