How Do You Derive Expansivity and Isothermal Compressibility for an Ideal Gas?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the formulas for expansivity (β) and isothermal compressibility (κ) for an ideal gas. Expansivity is defined as β = (1/V)(∂V/∂T)_P, while isothermal compressibility is defined as κ = -(1/V)(∂V/∂P)_T. Using the ideal gas law (PV = RT), participants explore how to express these derivatives in terms of temperature and pressure. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing that volume is a function of multiple variables, necessitating the use of partial derivatives. The thread concludes with guidance on applying these definitions to arrive at the desired results.
LeePhilip01
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that:-
a) the expansivity \beta = \frac{1}{T}
b) the isothermal compressibilty \kappa = \frac{1}{P}


Homework Equations


P\upsilon = RT where \upsilon = molar volume


The Attempt at a Solution


A big mess!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi LeePhilip01, welcome to PF. Do you know how the expansivity and isothermal compressibility are defined in general? (Hint: it will involve derivatives.)
 
Yes, however i wasn't sure whether they were important because they weren't given in th question.

\beta = \frac{1}{V} . \frac{dV}{dT}

\kappa = - \frac{1}{V} . \frac{dV}{dP}
 
To be precise, we should say

\beta=\frac{1}{V}\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)_P[/itex]<br /> <br /> \kappa=-\frac{1}{V}\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial P}\right)_T[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; to acknowledge that &lt;i&gt;V&lt;/i&gt; is a function of multiple variables and that we are taking the partial derivative with respect to one of the variables while holding the others constant.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Now use&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Pv=RT[/itex]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; \beta=\frac{1}{v}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)_P=\frac{1}{v}\,\frac{\partial }{\partial T}\left(\frac{RT}{P}\right)\right)_P[/itex]&amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; and so on.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top