How Do You Determine the Best Value of β in L-S Coupling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tasos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupling
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the optimal value of the parameter β in L-S coupling based on energy gaps between the states ^3F_2, ^3F_3, and ^3F_4. The calculations reveal that the energy differences can be expressed in terms of β, leading to different values: one calculation yields β = 85.5, while another gives β = 108. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly calculating energy differences, noting that terms involving angular momentum quantum numbers L and S cancel out. Additionally, there is a suggestion to ensure consistency in the units used for energy measurements. The conversation highlights the complexity of accurately determining β due to varying results from different approaches.
tasos
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[/B]
We have that the three lowest energy states of a system are $$ ^3F_2, ^3F_3, ^3F_4 $$ (these are the Term symbols) with relative energy gap $$0,\ 171,\ 387 \ cm^{-1}$$
Now using the perturbation $$H_{LS}=\beta \ \vec{L}\cdot \vec{S}$$ i have to find the best value of the parameter β that fits best with the energy gaps.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
As i read fine structure is responsible for splitting $$ ^3F$$ into the 3 degenerate states $$ ^3F_2, ^3F_3, ^3F_4 $$

I calculate the term $$\langle\ \vec{L}\cdot \vec{S} \rangle = \ \vec{J}(\ \vec{J} + 1) -\ \vec{L}(\ \vec{L}+1) -\ \vec{S}(\ \vec{S}+1) $$

So now we have that $$E_{LS} = \frac{\beta}{2}( \ \vec{J}(\ \vec{J} + 1) -\ \vec{L}(\ \vec{L}+1) -\ \vec{S}(\ \vec{S}+1) )$$
So we see the splitting:

$$E_{^3F_3} - E_{^3F_2} = 2\beta$$
$$E_{^3F_4} - E_{^3F_3} = \beta$$

The first abstraction give the value $$\beta =85.5$$
The second abstraction gives the valut $$\beta = 108$$

So if all the above are correct what's the best value of the parameter β that fits best with the energy gaps?Thnx.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You shouldn't have removed the other sections of the templates. You are required to follow the template as it's in the guideline of Homework section and also because no one is supposed to provide help before the poster posts his own effort.
 
tasos said:
So we see the splitting:

$$E_{^3F_3} - E_{^3F_2} = 2\beta$$
$$E_{^3F_4} - E_{^3F_3} = \beta$$
You seemed to be making mistakes when calculating the energy difference in terms of ##\beta##. For instance, in calculating ##
E_{^3F_3} - E_{^3F_2}##, the terms containing ##L## and ##S## in each energy expressions will cancel because the two states have the same values for those quantum numbers. Only the terms containing ##J## will contribute, the first term has ##J=3## and second term has ##J=2##.

Also take care of which system of unit you are using. If you use atomic unit in which ##\hbar=1##, you should also convert the given energy difference (in terms of wave number) into atomic unit of energy.
 
Ok sorry. So here the energy interval between adjacent J levels is

$$ΔE_{FS}= E_J -E_{J-1}= \beta J$$So for J=4 we have $$ ΔE_{FS}= E_4 -E_{3} = 4 \beta $$ so here $$ \beta =42,75 cm^−1$$
and for J=3 we have $$ΔE_{FS}= E_3 -E_{2} = 3 \beta$$ so here $$ \beta =72 cm^−1$$ANd if I am correctly how i decide the best value of β
 
Ignoring any common constant factors in energies and the units, for ##E_4-E_3##,
$$
\beta = \frac{E_4-E_3}{4} = \frac{171}{4} = ?
$$
while for ##E_3-E_2##,
$$
\beta = \frac{E_3-E_2}{3} = \frac{387-171}{3} = ?
$$
The two ##?##'s obtained from the two energy differences are alike, as they should be. It appears really strange to me that you keep getting very different values of ##\beta##.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top