How Do You Integrate \( \frac{x}{(1-x^2)} \) dx?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomwilliam2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration parts
Click For Summary
The integral \( \int \frac{x}{(1-x^2)} dx \) can be approached using substitution methods. A common substitution is \( y = x^2 \), which simplifies the integral to \( \int \frac{1}{2(1-y)} dy \). Another effective substitution is \( u = 1 - x^2 \), leading to \( -\frac{1}{2} \int \frac{du}{u} \). This approach clarifies the integration process and resolves confusion regarding the square root in earlier responses. The discussion emphasizes the importance of choosing the right substitution to simplify the integral.
tomwilliam2
Messages
117
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


$$\int \frac{x}{(1-x^2)} dx$$

Homework Equations



Integration by parts, by substitution, etc.

The Attempt at a Solution



I just can't remember how to begin this integration. I tried doing integration by parts, where
$$a(x) = x$$
$$a'(x) = 1$$
$$b(x) = $$
$$b'(x) = \frac{1}{(1-x^2)}$$
$$\int \frac{x}{(1-x^2)}dx = xb(x) - \int \frac{1}{(1-x^2)} dx$$

But couldn't work out what form b(x) should take.
Thanks in advance for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have seen enough of these integrals, they can essentially done "by observation"

If not, substitution is a good method to use. Substitute y = x^{2}. Then dy = 2x dx
Then the integral becomes:
\int \frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{1-y}dy

Does that now look more doable?
 
Last edited:
Why not let u= 1- x^2 itself? Then du= -2xdx so that xdx= -(1/2)du do that
-\frac{1}{2}\int \frac{du}{u}
 
Ah yes, thanks...that makes sense. I wasn't getting where the sqrt cam from in the first response.
Thanks to both of you
 
tomwilliam2 said:
I wasn't getting where the sqrt cam from in the first response
Oops, typo, my bad.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K