How do you know what goes together to form a 4-vector?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astrofiend
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    4-vector Form
AI Thread Summary
Determining what quantities form a 4-vector in physics relies on their transformation properties under Lorentz transformations. Key examples include the energy-momentum 4-vector and the charge-current density 4-vector, which both exhibit these properties. A guiding principle is that if a quantity appears in a covariant equation, it is likely a 4-vector or spinor. Additionally, one-dimensional quantities, such as current and its density, naturally combine into 4-vectors. Understanding these relationships is essential for studying relativity and quantum mechanics.
Astrofiend
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I've been studying relativity and standard model physics, and I don't understand how it is determined what 'things' go together to form a 4-vector. For example, there is the familiar energy momentum 4-vector, the charge-current density four vector, the phi-A (scalar/vector potential) 4-vector from electromagnetism, the frequency-wavevector four vector from special relativity, and so on and so forth.

Apart from the fact that these quantities evidently DO transform as four-vectors, is there some first principle argument that shows what quantities will go together to transform as a four-vector, like say in quantum mechanics where non-commuting operators indicate the existence of an uncertainty relation between quantities? Like how would you know that charge density and current density would form components of a 4vector and transform like one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Astrofiend! :smile:

If it turns up in a covariant equation, it has to be a spinor or a 4-vector or …

If it's one-dimensional, it'll be a 4-vector. :wink:

(eg current has dimension one, so it'll be part of a 4-vector, and so will its density)
 
Cheers mate - appreciate the response! I'll have to go away and think it over a bit...
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top