How Do You Solve Complex Cubic Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thavamaran
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the complex cubic equation 0=(-6.5x10^-14*X^3)-(1x10^-16*X^2)-(X/1x10^-8)+(1.3036x10^32), users are advised to utilize online resources for guidance. A suggested method includes searching for "wiki factor cubic" on Google for relevant information. The discussion emphasizes the need for a systematic approach to finding the variable X. Participants are encouraged to explore mathematical tools and techniques available online. Overall, leveraging online resources can effectively assist in solving cubic equations.
thavamaran
39
0
Hi there guys, how are you all?

I really need to find a way to solve this equation, but I have forgotten most of my maths, i just need a lead on the method of solving this equation.

Code: 
0=(-6.5x10^-14*[I]X^3[/I])-(1x10^-16[I]*X^2[/I])-([I]X[/I]/1x10^-8)+(1.3036x10^32)

capital X is the variable. I need to solve and get the equivalent of the X. Please someone guide me on the method. Thanks very much! cheers!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Go to www.google.com
Type wiki factor cubic in the search box
Click I'm feeling lucky
 
Im really feeling lucky!

Thank you very much...CHEERS!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Partial Differential Equation solved using Products
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Quadratic, cubic, quartic, quintic equations
Replies
16
Views
4K
B Are Inverse Problems More Complex Than Direct Problems in Mathematics?
Replies
13
Views
3K
MHB Understanding Cubic Equation Formula for Polynomials of Degree Three
Replies
9
Views
3K
MHB Solving Cubic Equation: x^3 - kx + (k + 11) = 0
Replies
3
Views
2K
I The solution to a cubic equation
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB How to solve following optimization problem?
Replies
2
Views
1K
MHB How can I solve more complex exponential equations?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I How do you solve systems of equations in complex physics problems?
Replies
6
Views
2K
MHB Solve 8^x+8^(-x)=? When 4^x+4^(-x)=8
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top