How Do You Solve the Wave Equation Using Coefficient Equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the wave equation by calculating second derivatives with respect to x and t, and substituting them into the wave equation. The coefficients are equated, leading to the relationship A''(x) = -k^2 A(x), which suggests a solution of the form A(x) = Csin(kx + psi). Applying boundary conditions results in the quantization condition sin(kL) = 0, leading to k(n) = nPI/L for n=1,2,3..., which defines the normal mode frequencies w(n) = nPI/L * v. Clarification is sought for part (b), particularly regarding the relationship between wavelength and string length.
Lavace
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/8236/waveeq.jpg



The Attempt at a Solution



We calculate second differential with respect to x, and t, substitute into the wave equation.

We then equate the coefficients: [A''(x) + (w/v)^2A(x)]sin(wt)=0

We know from SHM equation that: A''(x) = -(w/v)^2A(x), and hence A''(x) = -k^2 A(x)

But where do we go from here? Any hints?

Also, what about part b?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
From A''(x) = -k^2 A(x), we seek a solution of the form A(x) = Csin(kx + psi)

Apply our boundary conditions of y(0,t) and y(L,t) both = 0.

We end up with sin(kL) = 0, where kL varies from 0 to 2PI, this implies that kL=nPI where n=1,2,3...

Because it's quantised, we can say k(n) = nPI/L, where n=1,2,3...

Since k = w/v, w(n) =nPI/L . vWhere w(n) are the normal mode frequencies.

Could someone verify this is correct?
 
Also, any clues for b)?
 
Looks good for part (a).
For (b), I'm not quite sure what they are getting at. In a sense, you already showed this in your derivation for part (a). Maybe they want you to think in terms of the wavelength λ and how it relates to the string length L.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top