MHB How does 12 + j16 become 20 ∠53.1° in impedance calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter portcharlotte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impedance
AI Thread Summary
The impedance calculation converts the complex number 12 + j16 into polar form, resulting in 20 ∠53.1°. This transformation utilizes the relationships between Cartesian and polar coordinates, where r is calculated as the square root of the sum of the squares of the real and imaginary components. Specifically, r equals 20, derived from √(12² + 16²). The angle θ is found using the arctangent function, yielding approximately 53.1°. This process illustrates the conversion from rectangular to polar representation in impedance calculations.
portcharlotte
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Good morning,

I was reviewing a problem in my book regarding Impedance. I have a question. For the impedance -Z they got 20 ∠53.1° degrees How did they go from 12 + j16 to 20 ∠53.1°. Thanks

View attachment 8827
 

Attachments

  • 12.11 Text Book Need Help.JPG
    12.11 Text Book Need Help.JPG
    50.8 KB · Views: 110
Mathematics news on Phys.org
portcharlotte said:
Good morning,

I was reviewing a problem in my book regarding Impedance. I have a question. For the impedance -Z they got 20 ∠53.1° degrees How did they go from 12 + j16 to 20 ∠53.1°. Thanks

Hi portcharlotte, welcome to MHB! ;)

Every imaginary number has a cartesian representation and a polar representation.
The relation between $x+jy$ and $r∠\theta$ is given by $r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ and $\theta=\arctan\frac yx$.
That is, unless $x\le 0$ in which case we have to select the appropriate $\theta$ in the unit circle, as it is out of range of $\arctan$.

In this case we have $x=12$ and $y=16$. Therefore $r=\sqrt{12^2+16^2}=20$ and $\theta=\arctan\frac{16}{12}\approx 53.1°$
 
Thank you so much Professor.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top