MHB How Does 31.7 Equal 1.6% in This Math Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tripp1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To understand how 31.7 equals 1.6%, it's crucial to recognize that a percentage is a fraction of a whole. Specifically, for 31.7 to represent 1.6%, it must be 1.6% of approximately 1980. The original problem does not provide the context or total amount needed to validate this percentage. Without that information, the connection between 31.7 and 1.6% remains unclear. Clarifying the total amount is essential for solving the problem accurately.
Tripp1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have the anwser I just don't know how they got it.

Here is the problem:

1428 divided by 45 = 31.7 which also equals out to 1.6%

I can't figure out how it equals 1.6%
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Tripp said:
I have the anwser I just don't know how they got it.

Here is the problem:

1428 divided by 45 = 31.7 which also equals out to 1.6%

I can't figure out how it equals 1.6%

Hi Tripp! Welcome to MHB. :)

A percentage is always of some amount.
For 31.7 to be equal to 1.6%, it needs to be 1.6% of about 1980.
Is a number like 1980 given somewhere?
Otherwise I can't figure it out either.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
288
Back
Top