How Does a Rod Attached to a Spring Undergo Simple Harmonic Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter K.QMUL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillations
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a rod attached to a spring, demonstrating simple harmonic motion (SHM) when displaced at small angles. The rod, pivoted at its midpoint, experiences a torque due to the spring's force, which is derived using the small angle approximation. The resulting equation of motion indicates that the rod will oscillate with a specific period of 2π√(M/3k). Participants clarify terminology, such as the distinction between "couple" and "torque," and emphasize the importance of notation accuracy in calculations. The conversation highlights the need for detailed step-by-step explanations to understand the derivation of the solution.
K.QMUL
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The figure shows a thin uniform rod of mass M and length 2L that is pivoted without friction about an axis through its midpoint.A horizontal light spring ofspring constant k is attached to the lower end of the rod.The spring is at its equilibrium length when the angleθ with respect to the vertical is zero.Show that for oscillations of small amplitude, the rod will undergo SHM with a period of 2π√M/3k. The moment of inertia of the rod about its midpoint is ML2/3.(Assume the small angle approximations)

The Attempt at a Solution



My book gives the following answer but is not indepth, could someone help me out by going through step by step how they came to this answer...

Couple acting on rod = −kLsinθ×Lcosθ=−kL2θ for smallθ.
Hence, I(d^2θ/dt^2)=−kL^2θ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure. My telepathic powers are limited, however, so I can't see the figure clearly. Is the spring dangling loose or is it attached to something fixed :smile: ?

As I said, limited powers, so I can't read what you intended to fill in under 2., either. Could you oblige ?

Then: the english word for couple is torque.
 
I think I've solved it, never mind, thanks for your offer
 
You should also learn to use superscripts. L2 and L2 are not the same thing.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top