B How does a spinor affect a wave function?

justpeeking
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
How do spinors affect wave function solutions? Like how is the output different
 
Physics news on Phys.org
justpeeking said:
How do spinors affect wave function solutions? Like how is the output different
The wave function of a particle with spin is the composition of a spatial component and a spinor. See the Dirac equation, for example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation
 
justpeeking said:
How do spinors affect wave function solutions? Like how is the output different
Due to spin, you can have a state with two electrons with the same spatial wave function. It has dramatic consequences for chemistry, see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_atom.
 
PeroK said:
The wave function of a particle with spin is the composition of a spatial component and a spinor. See the Dirac equation, for example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation

Respecting your expertise and appreciating Demystifier's enlightening answer, nevertheless might a slightly more illluminating answer* to the question be:

A spinor wave function has multiple spatial components (four for a single-electron solution of the Dirac equation).

It is the algebraic properties of this multicomponent object that makes it a spinor.

In the case of Pauli's early phenomenological theory of spin, he developed spinors that had 2-complex components (just two complex numbers). These can be combined with spatial wave functions, as your own answer states, in a manner that is very clearly illustrated in Richard Fitzpatrick's article https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qm/lectures/node51.html

So rather than ask "How ... spinors affect wave function solutions" it might be better to ask "what characterises a wave function solution as a spinor" (i.e. being components of a spinors doesn't change (affect) the spatial wave functions themselves, but rather associates them in such a way that the whole mathematical object is - has the properties of - a spinor.)

* OK - pedantic if you prefer
 
Last edited:
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top