How does a superconductivity cable achieve zero resistance?

AI Thread Summary
Superconductivity cables achieve zero resistance by incorporating superconducting filaments alongside conventional copper, where the superconducting path allows electricity to flow without any resistance. Although copper has its own resistance, the presence of the superconducting material means that the majority of the current will preferentially flow through the superconducting path, effectively rendering the overall resistance of the system zero. This phenomenon can be understood through the principle that current prefers the path of least resistance, which in this case is the superconducting filament. As a result, the current bypasses the copper entirely, leading to infinite conductivity in the superconducting path. This explanation highlights the unique properties of superconductors in electrical systems.
StephenP91
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Well. I have the image of the question.

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/6834/question5.png

Question b)ii).

I know that the total resistance of the cable is 0 even though the copper itself still has resistance. I just want to know how the combination of the Superconducting filaments combined with the copper itself makes the over all resistance 0.

Thank you,
Stephen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of it has the electircity taking the easiest path.
If you have two resistors in parallel and one has twice the resistance of the other, then twice as much electricty will flow down the small resistance (the easiest path) as down the high resistance path.

With a superconductor, one of the paths is perfectly 'easy' so infinitely more times as much electricty will flow down this path as the copper.
Or looking at it the other way - none of the electricty will take the copper path and the overall conductivity is still zero.
 
I think I understand now. Because I is inversely proportional to R and because the filament's R is infinitely smaller than the copper's R, the filament gets infinitely more/all of the current.

Well that's how I've made sense of it. Whether it's right or not, I don't know.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top