How Does Capacitance Change with Multiple Dielectric Materials in a Capacitor

AI Thread Summary
Capacitance in capacitors with multiple dielectric materials can be calculated using a modified version of Maxwell's equations. The equivalent capacitance for capacitors with two distinct dielectrics, each with different dielectric constants, can be determined using the formula C_eq = (C_1 C_2) / (C_1 + C_2), where C_1 and C_2 are the capacitances of each dielectric. If the thickness of each dielectric is equal, the total distance between the plates is effectively doubled. Understanding this approach allows for the integration of multiple dielectric materials into the capacitance calculation. This method highlights the importance of dielectric constants and their arrangement within the capacitor.
xcutexboax
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys,

I was just doing a question on capacitance and i was wondering since capacitance is usually determined by a fixed formula which is dependent on the di electric material that is contained within a capacitor.. However it struck me that a capacitor does not neccesarily contain only one kind of material. How does the expression of the formula changes if a capacitor can contain more than one kind of di-electric materials... pls enlighten me... IS it based on the area they occupy? ThAnks. :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IIRC, for multiple dielectric capacitors, you would simply use the modification of one of Maxwell's equations, namely: V = \int{\kappa\overrightarrow{E} \cdot d\overrightarrow{s}. In this case, you integrate over the thickness of one capacitor, then over the thickness of the other capacitor, then add the two results to find the electric potential across the plates.
 
If I was referring to the formula C=k*epsilon*A/d where k is the dielectric constant of the material, how does finding the potential change the above expression? I mean if a capacitor can contain like 3 dielectric materials of different k, how does it affect the above expression/formula? =)
 
If you have a capacitor with two distinct materials as dielectrics in between the plates with dielectric constants \kappa_1 & \kappa_2 (and assuming you're dealing with a standard, flat parallel plate capacitor here), if the thickness of material one is the same as that of material two (let's say a thickness of d), then the equivalent capacitance is given by C_{eq} = \frac{C_1 C_2}{C_1+C_2}, where C_1 = \frac{\kappa_1 \epsilon_0 A}{d}, and same for C_2. Of course, in this case, I'm taking the actual plate-distance to be 2d. :wink:
 
Oh i finally understand... u took the capacitor like a circuit which contatins other "capacitors". Marvellous... Okie thanks for the tip.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top