How Does Charge Distribution Affect Electric Fields in a Coaxial Cable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter critter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coaxial Density
AI Thread Summary
In a coaxial cable with an inner positively charged cylinder and an outer neutral cylinder, the electric field between the cylinders is given by E=(2kλ)/r, while outside the outer cylinder, the field is zero. The outer cylinder, despite having no net charge, has surface charge densities that are equal and opposite to the inner cylinder's charge density, resulting in a charge of -λ on its inner surface. Gauss's law indicates that the total charge enclosed between the cylinders must be zero, leading to the conclusion that the outer surface of the outer cylinder has no charge. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing electric fields in coaxial configurations.
critter
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. A long coaxial cable consists of an inner cylindrical conductor with radius "a" and an outer coaxial cylinder with inner radius "b" and outer radius "c." The outer cylinder is mounded on insulating supports and has no net charge. The inner cylinder has a positive charge per unit length λ. Calculate the electric field (A) at any point between the cylinders a distance "r" from the axis and (B) at any point outside the outer cylinder. (C) Find the charge per unit length on the inner surface and on the outer surface of the outer cylinder.



2. Parts A and B seem really simple, but maybe I'm looking at this wrong. I don't understand how the outer cylinder has any charge density since it was already stated that the outer cylinder has no net charge.



3. I think A and B might have the same answer: (2kλ)/r. This equation was given in the chapter summary in my textbook, but I somehow think they might be wanting a more extensive proof. I have no idea how to approach C since the information given in the problem seems contradictory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
critter said:
I don't understand how the outer cylinder has any charge density since it was already stated that the outer cylinder has no net charge.
Just because the net charge is zero doesn't mean the surface charge densities are zero.
 
How would I solve for the density with what I'm given? Would they both be equal to λ?
 
critter said:
How would I solve for the density with what I'm given?
Use Gauss's law.
Would they both be equal to λ?
In magnitude.
 
I think I'm starting to understand. There is some charge q enclosed between the two cylinders. The inner cylinder produces the electric field E=(2kλ)/r, and the total flux is equal to 0, so the outer cylinder must produce a field E=(-2kλ)/r. In that way, the magnitudes of the densities would be the same. Am I thinking about this correctly?
 
critter said:
I think I'm starting to understand. There is some charge q enclosed between the two cylinders. The inner cylinder produces the electric field E=(2kλ)/r, and the total flux is equal to 0, so the outer cylinder must produce a field E=(-2kλ)/r. In that way, the magnitudes of the densities would be the same. Am I thinking about this correctly?
I'm not exactly sure what you are referring to when you say outer cylinder, since it has two surfaces. (I think you have it, but are expressing it unclearly.)

The inner cylinder (radius a) produces a field E=(2kλ)/r for r > a.

Since the field within the outer conducting cylinder (b < r < c) must be zero, Gauss's law tells you that the total charge enclosed must be zero. Thus the inner surface of the outer shell (at r = b) must have a charge equal and opposite to λ.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top