How Does Earth's Magnetic Field Influence AC and DC Currents?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of AC current in a current balance experiment, questioning its advantages over DC current in the context of Earth's magnetic field. The Hall effect is highlighted, suggesting that the sideways Lorentz force from the magnetic field could influence charge carriers differently in AC versus DC. It is proposed that AC, which flows in both directions, might cancel out the Lorentz force, while DC, flowing in one direction, could be more affected. Participants express the need for clarity on how the Earth's magnetic field impacts the experiment, particularly regarding signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvements with AC. Overall, the conversation explores the interplay between magnetic fields and current types in experimental setups.
mikee
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

Hello i just have an interesting question, and was wondering if my answer to it had any validity.
Ok so i did an experiment The Current balance experiment(for everyone not familiar with it, you can google it and get all the info you want) to try and estimate mu naught. Anyways AC current was used in the experiment so transformers could be used to adjust the voltage applied to the circuit. So the question was why else was AC current used rather than DC. My answer to this question is, could this be due to the fact that the Earth has a magnetic field that will effect the experiment because the of the hall affect. Which is when charge carriers of a current carrying conductor experience a sideways Lorentz force due to Earth's magnetic field which results in a charge separation in a direction perpendicular to the current and to the magnetic field. So will this affect DC current because it only flows in one direction, but since AC flows in both directions will it somehow cancel out the Lorentz force?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
mikee said:

Homework Statement

Hello i just have an interesting question, and was wondering if my answer to it had any validity.
Ok so i did an experiment The Current balance experiment(for everyone not familiar with it, you can google it and get all the info you want) to try and estimate mu naught. Anyways AC current was used in the experiment so transformers could be used to adjust the voltage applied to the circuit. So the question was why else was AC current used rather than DC. My answer to this question is, could this be due to the fact that the Earth has a magnetic field that will effect the experiment because the of the hall affect. Which is when charge carriers of a current carrying conductor experience a sideways Lorentz force due to Earth's magnetic field which results in a charge separation in a direction perpendicular to the current and to the magnetic field. So will this affect DC current because it only flows in one direction, but since AC flows in both directions will it somehow cancel out the Lorentz force?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Please do not tell us to "Google it" to find the background and context of your question. That is a bit insulting, and a waste of our time.

Anyways AC current was used in the experiment so transformers could be used to adjust the voltage applied to the circuit. So the question was why else was AC current used

I think your point about the Earth's DC magnetic field may be valid, but without more info on the experiment that you conducted, it's hard to give you useful feedback...
 
Ok i didnt mean to insult anyone, i just thought anyone who could answer the question would be familiar with the experiment and disregard that comment. Anyways In this experiment we used a current balance in which the upper conductor is free to pivot
on knife edges. The upper conductor is balanced so that the wires are a small distance apart. The conductors are wired in series to carry the same current but in opposite directions, so that the wires rather repel than attract. So we are to measure the displacement of the two parallel conductors where as stated above only the top wire is able to move
 
mikee said:
Ok i didnt mean to insult anyone, i just thought anyone who could answer the question would be familiar with the experiment and disregard that comment. Anyways In this experiment we used a current balance in which the upper conductor is free to pivot
on knife edges. The upper conductor is balanced so that the wires are a small distance apart. The conductors are wired in series to carry the same current but in opposite directions, so that the wires rather repel than attract. So we are to measure the displacement of the two parallel conductors where as stated above only the top wire is able to move

Is one of these images applicable (yes, I couldn't take it, I Googled it):

http://www.google.com/images?rlz=1T...ent&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi

From your description so far, I'm not seeing where a DC B field from the Earth would be a factor. Maybe the AC component comes in for signal-to-noise ratio improvement? Are you familiar with why that can help SNR?
 
Yes the second image is applicable. Where T and H are the parallel conductors where the current will run to make them repel each other. And I am not exactly sure why the AC component would help? I would think because it oscillates back and forth it would be harder to filter the noise out?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top