How Does Electron Decay in a Magnetic Field Work?

elementHTTP
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
So i was watching Susskind lectures on entanglements
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaTF4QZ94Fk
and there he mention decay (electron in magnetic field emits a photon whit certain probability )

That made me wonder :
1. How long you have to wait for emission to occur ? (for probability of 1/2 )
2. Dose decay time depend on spin orientation ? ( kinda like probability of photon emission depends on spin orientation)
3. In witch direction is photon emitted ?
4 How do you detect that photon ?


It will be awesome if you can provide links for some of those experiments/data :D
Thanks

+ random fun question
hypothetically speaking how much electron decaying in magnetic field ( with probability of 1 ) will it take to create 6kW laser like beam :D :D :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org


elementHTTP said:
So i was watching Susskind lectures on entanglements
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaTF4QZ94Fk
and there he mention decay (electron in magnetic field emits a photon whit certain probability )

That made me wonder :
1. How long you have to wait for emission to occur ? (for probability of 1/2 )
2. Dose decay time depend on spin orientation ? ( kinda like probability of photon emission depends on spin orientation)
3. In witch direction is photon emitted ?
4 How do you detect that photon ?


It will be awesome if you can provide links for some of those experiments/data :D
Thanks

+ random fun question
hypothetically speaking how much electron decaying in magnetic field ( with probability of 1 ) will it take to create 6kW laser like beam :D :D :D

2. is easy. The answer is no. The probability of emission does depend on the prepared orientation, but since

(1) the electron is then in a specific superimposition of the up state and the down state w.r.t. the magnetic field and
(2) the down state does not decay at all

the decay time constant is the same as for the pure up state.
 
Last edited:
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top