How Does Electron Degeneracy Allow White Dwarf Stars to Emit Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnahh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degeneracy
Johnahh
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Yesterday i had a thought about when our sun runs out of energy and collapses into a white dwarf, it is my understanding when this happens a white dwarf is held up by electron degeneracy, all the electrons are under immense pressure but cannot fall to the lowest energy state therefore stopping the star from collapse due to gravity.
My question is how can this star still emit light as the electrons cannot change energy levels?
Unless my understanding of degeneracy is wrong and they can in fact change energy levels, if this is the case would anyone care to explain?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At absolute zero the degeneracy is complete. All the states up to the Fermi level are occupied, and particles are unable to move from one state to another. (Electrons in a white dwarf, neutrons in a neutron star.) But at a finite temperature some of the particles are excited above the Fermi level, leaving vacancies, where some of them interact with other particles, such as photons.
 
[QUOTEAt absolute zero the degeneracy is complete. All the states up to the Fermi level are occupied, and particles are unable to move from one state to another. (Electrons in a white dwarf, neutrons in a neutron star.) But at a finite temperature some of the particles are excited above the Fermi level, leaving vacancies, where some of them interact with other particles, such as photons.][/QUOTE]

Is it the immense pressure that is causing this high temperature creating interactions?
 
I think the degeneracy only occurs in the lower levels of the white dwarf, whereas on the upper levels and with the atmosphere on the surface electrons can still move.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top