How Does Gauss' Law Account for the Negative Plate in a Capacitor?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss' Law is applied to calculate the electric field in capacitors by initially considering only the positive plate, yielding a field of E = σ/(2ε₀). This approach assumes that the negative plate is present, as the fields between the plates add together, resulting in a total field of E = σ/ε₀. Outside the plates, the fields cancel each other out, leading to zero electric field in that region. The presence of the negative plate is crucial for understanding the overall field distribution and its effects on voltage and capacitance. Thus, while calculations can start with one plate, the interaction between both plates is essential for accurate results.
kash25
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a problem with electric fields in capacitors. Using Gauss' Law, we always choose the Gaussian surface that encloses the positive plate in the capacitor. When we go through field calculations, we get an equation for the electric field and we use that to find voltage, capacitance, and everything else. What I don't understand is how enclosing ONLY the positive plate takes into account the fact that the negative plate is present and that it amplifies the field between the two. In other words, how would our calculations or conclusions be any different if the negative plate were not even present?
Thank you very much for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi kash25,

I don't think that's correct. For example, for parallel plates we might use Gauss's law to find the electric field of just the postive plate (giving a result of E = \sigma/(2\epsilon_0) everywhere), but then we would double that to find the electric field of the capacitor between the plates (E=\sigma/\epsilon_0) and set the field to be zero outside the plates.

(Between the plates, the fields are in the same direction and so add; outside the plates they are in opposite directions and therefore cancel; also I'm making the usual approximation that the nonuniform field at the ends of the plate can be neglected, etc.)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top