How Does Gravity Influence the Speed of Light in Space-Time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dream431ca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space-time Speed
dream431ca
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok, here me out on this one. I got thinking a while back after I read some very amazing books quantum physics and theory of relativity and and a thought just came to me. I might just be crazy though.

My friend and I were discussing light speed and how gravity seems to "bend" light. We all know of these gravitational "lenses" that are created by galaxies millions of light years away. But then I got thinking of the speed of light and gravity.

I made up a scenario of the disappearing sun. One day the sun disappears. Now, we all know that light takes 8 minutes or so to travel from the sun to the Earth. If the sun disappeared we would not know until 8 minutes later. Then I thought of this question: If light takes 8 minutes to reach Earth from the sun, how long will it take before we notice the change of gravity from the sun not being there?

In one of the books I read (I think it was the Fabric of the Cosmos), it explains that light and gravity have the same "speed" so to speak. If light and gravity have the speed, that means that the space-time is changing at the same rate as the speed of light. (When the sun disappeared, the space-time that was distorted will change back to flat space at the same rate as the speed of light).

What I'm saying is that the warping of space-time (gravity) will change at the same rate as the speed of light.

It's late and I had no coffee, so I could be out of my mind. What do you guys think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi dream431ca! Welcome to PF! :smile:
dream431ca said:
… What I'm saying is that the warping of space-time (gravity) will change at the same rate as the speed of light.

Yes, that's basically correct …

gravity is believed to move at the speed of light, so the gravitational effect of any change in the Sun (for example, the Sun pulsating in and out … it's difficult to see how it could actually move away :wink:) should reach us at the same time as we see it. :smile:
 
Have a look at this
http://www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp"
 
Last edited by a moderator:


tiny-tim said:
gravity is believed to move at the speed of light,
Gravity doesn't move, it is already there. Statements like the above lead to wrong conclusions, about the direction of the gravitational pull of a moving gravity source. Gravity is not like light, but more like the electrical field. It is only the changes in gravity that propagate at light speed.
tiny-tim said:
so the gravitational effect of any change in the Sun (for example, the Sun pulsating in and out … it's difficult to see how it could actually move away :wink:) should reach us at the same time as we see it. :smile:
You mean the right thing, but laymen oft misunderstand this explanation.
 
vin300 said:
Have a look at this
Van Flandern is a pretty notorious anti-relativity crank. Have a look only if you have a bunch of spare time and absolutely nothing better to do.
 
"There is no dynamics within space-time itself: nothing ever moves therein; nothing happens; nothing changes. In particular, one does not think of particles as moving through space-time, or as following along their world-lines. Rather, particles are just in space-time, once and for all, and the world-line represents, all at once, the complete life history of the particle." R. Geroch, General Relativity from A to B (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1978), pp. 20-21.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Back
Top