How Does Kirchhoff's Loop Rule Apply to a Two Battery, Three Resistor Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter helpme12345
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Kirchhoff's Loop Rule to a circuit with two batteries and three resistors. Participants clarify that the two battery voltages can be combined, regardless of their positions in the circuit. They emphasize using Ohm's law to find the current by calculating the total resistance and applying the loop rule. The original poster's confusion about the "magnitude of the direction" is addressed, suggesting they meant to inquire about both the magnitude and direction of the current. The conversation concludes with a step-by-step approach to solving the circuit using Kirchhoff's principles.
helpme12345
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure where to begin. The problem asks to find the magnitude of the direction of the current in a two battery system with three resistors. However, it appears the junction rule cannot be applied. The loop rule may be implemented but I don't know how to get the current. The link to the problem is below.

http://negatrons.homestead.com/files/Kirchhoff.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Add the two cell pd's together for a start - just because they aren't next to each other doesn't mean that you can't add them up (they are both connected the same way round.

Then find the total resistance and you are nearly there.

Also, post these in the homework help section in future!
 
Magnitude of the direction of the current? I didn't know direction had magnitude.
 
helpme12345 said:
I'm not sure where to begin. The problem asks to find the magnitude of the direction of the current in a two battery system with three resistors. However, it appears the junction rule cannot be applied. The loop rule may be implemented but I don't know how to get the current.
It's a simple series circuit. Combine the batteries and the resistors and apply Ohm's law.
 
\unitlength 2mm<br /> \begin{picture}(65,84.38)(0,0)<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(35,80)(0.21,0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(36.25,81.25)(0.21,-0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(37.5,80)(0.21,0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(38.75,81.25)(0.21,-0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(40,80)(0.21,0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(41.25,81.25)(0.21,-0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(42.5,80){\line(1,0){1.25}}<br /> \put(37.5,82.5){\makebox(0,0)[bl]{R2}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(33.75,80){\line(1,0){1.25}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(58.75,73.75)(0.21,0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(58.75,73.75)(0.21,-0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(58.75,71.25)(0.21,0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(58.75,71.25)(0.21,-0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(58.75,68.75)(0.21,0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(58.75,68.75)(0.21,-0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(60,66.25){\line(0,1){1.25}}<br /> \put(61.25,71.25){\makebox(0,0)[bl]{R3}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(60,75){\line(0,1){1.25}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(40,60)(0.21,0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(41.25,61.25)(0.21,-0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(42.5,60)(0.21,0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(43.75,61.25)(0.21,-0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(45,60)(0.21,0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \multiput(46.25,61.25)(0.21,-0.21){6}{\line(1,0){0.21}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(47.5,60){\line(1,0){1.25}}<br /> \put(42.5,62.5){\makebox(0,0)[bl]{R1}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(38.75,60){\line(1,0){1.25}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(55,78.12){\line(0,1){3.75}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(56.25,76.25){\line(0,1){7.5}}<br /> \put(52.5,84.38){\makebox(0,0)[bl]{V2}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(56.25,80){\line(1,0){3.75}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(51.25,80){\line(1,0){3.75}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \qbezier(30,70)(30,62.81)(30,61.25)<br /> \qbezier(30,61.25)(30,59.69)(30,60)<br /> \put(30,60){\line(1,0){10}}<br /> \qbezier(40,60)(40,60)(40,60)<br /> \qbezier(40,60)(40,60)(40,60)<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(28.13,73.75){\line(1,0){3.75}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(26.25,75){\line(1,0){7.5}}<br /> \put(23.75,76.25){\makebox(0,0)[bl]{V1}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(30,75){\line(0,1){3.75}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(30,70){\line(0,1){3.75}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(49,60){\line(1,0){11}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(60,60){\line(0,1){6}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(30,80){\line(1,0){5}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \qbezier(30,80)(30,80)(30,80)<br /> \qbezier(30,80)(30,80)(30,80)<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(30,75){\line(0,1){5}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(44,80){\line(1,0){7}}<br /> \linethickness{0.3mm}<br /> \put(60,75){\line(0,1){5}}<br /> \linethickness{0.25mm}<br /> \put(49,80){\circle*{1}}<br /> \linethickness{0.25mm}<br /> \put(30,80){\circle*{1}}<br /> \linethickness{0.25mm}<br /> \put(60,80){\circle*{1}}<br /> \linethickness{0.25mm}<br /> \put(60,60){\circle*{1}}<br /> \linethickness{0.25mm}<br /> \put(30,60){\circle*{1}}<br /> \put(62,82){\makebox(0,0)[cc]{C}}<br /> \put(65,72){\makebox(0,0)[cc]{}}<br /> \put(62,60){\makebox(0,0)[cc]{A}}<br /> \put(28,62){\makebox(0,0)[cc]{B}}<br /> \put(29,82){\makebox(0,0)[cc]{D}}<br /> \put(48,82){\makebox(0,0)[cc]{E}}<br /> \end{picture}<br />

While it may be really simple, let's apply the loop rule... to see that the rule really works [and so I can try to draw a circuit :cool: ].

(Assume that we traverse the loop clockwise, which defines our choice of "positive current" [akin to choosing an axis].)
\begin{align*}<br /> 0&amp;=(V_B-V_A) + (V_D-V_B) + (V_E-V_D)+ (V_C-V_E)+ (V_A-V_E)\\<br /> &amp;=(-I_1R_1)+(V_1)+(-I_2R_2)+(V_2)+(-I_3R_3)\\<br /> \intertext{in series, the currents are equal}<br /> &amp;=(-IR_1)+(V_1)+(-IR_2)+(V_2)+(-IR_3)\\<br /> &amp;=-I(R_1+R_2+R_3)+(V_1+V_2)\\<br /> \end{align*}
Now, solve for the current I.

I think the original poster meant "magnitude and direction" of the current.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top