How does Many Worlds theory explain Schroedinger's cat

In summary, the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is a way of looking at the universe where every instant there's a 50/50 chance of a cat dying. This determines the outcome of an observation.
  • #1
daf2
1
0
As I understand it, when Schroedinger's "box" is opened, then a dead cat comes into existence in one universe and a live cat in another. However, in a variation to this experiment, in which there is say a 10% chance of the cat living and 90% dying, when the box is opened does one live cat come into being in one universe and 9 dead cats appear in 9 identical universes.

If this is the case then as the 9 universes with the dead cats are identical would they merge into one, which overall has the end effect of making the live/dead odds of 50%
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The way I understand it, the many worlds theory doesn't say that the dead/living cat "comes into existence" at all, but rather that the universe splits at every instant in which the cat might die. It just so happens that every second, there's a (let's say) 50/50 chance of the cat dying. The cat you observe depends on which cat exists in your universe. So (for the sake of argument) for t=1, there's 2 universes, one where the cat's living, one where it's dead. at t=2, there's 3 universes. one where the cat's living, one where it JUST died, and one where it died two seconds ago. From my understanding, it removes the whole idea of "observation" from quantum mechanics... but I'm in absolutely no way an authority on these matters and have possibly gotten more things wrong than right. This is just how I understand it.
edit: also, from my understanding, these universes live in the same space but have decohered from one another, so that they're on another frequency, so to speak.
 
  • #3
daytripper said:
The way I understand it, the many worlds theory doesn't say that the dead/living cat "comes into existence" at all, but rather that the universe splits at every instant in which the cat might die. It just so happens that every second, there's a (let's say) 50/50 chance of the cat dying. The cat you observe depends on which cat exists in your universe. So (for the sake of argument) for t=1, there's 2 universes, one where the cat's living, one where it's dead. at t=2, there's 3 universes. one where the cat's living, one where it JUST died, and one where it died two seconds ago. From my understanding, it removes the whole idea of "observation" from quantum mechanics... but I'm in absolutely no way an authority on these matters and have possibly gotten more things wrong than right. This is just how I understand it.
edit: also, from my understanding, these universes live in the same space but have decohered from one another, so that they're on another frequency, so to speak.

Off topic, but do they go over this stuff in college?
 
  • #4
renob said:
Off topic, but do they go over this stuff in college?

I know they go over the uncertainty principle and such but I don't know if they address the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. I'm a second year CSC major at CalPoly (SLO) and know a few physics majors who have taken a course called "Modern Physics", which is basically quantum mechanics but I've no clue how deep they delve into the subject matter. I wish that class was part of my degree, though.
 
  • #5
We didn't go over interpretations at all in my undergrad study. They're not really necessary for most work you'll do in the field. It's either a philosophical question, or a highly theoretical one.
 
  • #6
I love how easily the line between philosophy and physics is blurred. Seems something worth doing (I don't know if I'll ever forgive Carlin for mocking our space program. haha).
 

FAQ: How does Many Worlds theory explain Schroedinger's cat

How does the Many Worlds theory explain the paradox of Schroedinger's cat?

According to the Many Worlds theory, the cat exists in multiple parallel universes simultaneously. In one universe, the cat is alive and in another, it is dead. This theory suggests that all possible outcomes of a quantum event exist in different universes, thus eliminating the paradox.

Does the Many Worlds theory provide a solution to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics?

Yes, the Many Worlds theory suggests that the wavefunction collapse, which is a key component of the measurement problem, does not actually occur. Instead, all possible outcomes of a quantum event are realized in different parallel universes.

How does the Many Worlds theory differ from the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics?

The Copenhagen interpretation suggests that the act of observation or measurement by a conscious observer causes the wavefunction collapse, while the Many Worlds theory does not require a conscious observer and instead proposes the existence of multiple parallel universes.

Can the Many Worlds theory be proven?

The Many Worlds theory is currently a theoretical framework and has not been proven. However, it is a valid interpretation of quantum mechanics and has been used to explain various quantum phenomena.

What implications does the Many Worlds theory have on the concept of reality?

The Many Worlds theory suggests that reality is not fixed and objective, but rather subjective and constantly branching into different parallel universes. It challenges the traditional concept of a single objective reality and raises questions about the nature of existence and consciousness.

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
76
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
247
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
143
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top