How Does Mathematics Explain the Mechanism of a Cartesian Diver?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crazykartman69
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Works
AI Thread Summary
The Cartesian diver operates based on the principles of pressure and volume as described by the equation P1*V1=P2*V2, reflecting the behavior of gases in a closed system. When pressure is applied to the bottle, it compresses the air inside the diver, causing the volume of air to decrease and the density of the diver to increase. As the density surpasses that of water, the diver sinks. The discussion also raises questions about the relative air pressure inside the container compared to the external environment before pressure is applied. Understanding these mathematical relationships is key to explaining the mechanism of a Cartesian diver.
crazykartman69
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i would like to know how a cartesian diver works using mathematics. I have found how the diver works using words and explanation but not using equations and math. Please HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
P1*V1=P2*V2 Since you basically have a closed system (the diver plus the water bottle) by applying pressure on the bottle, you are effectively transferring this pressure to the cartesian diver. This is because water is pretty much uncompressible. So, because the pressure is increased, the volume of air must decrease. Because we have a closed system, the water goes into the void created by the compressed air, the density increases until it is greater than that of water and it sinks.
 
Hey I am new here and i also need help on the Cartesian Diver. I was just wondering if The air pressure is the same, less than, much less than, greater or much greater than the air pressure outside of the bottle or container before pressure is applied to the container.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top