I How Does Non-Stretchy Mat Material Affect Trampoline Performance?

AI Thread Summary
Non-stretchy mat materials on trampolines can significantly enhance rebound efficiency by shifting the rebound dynamics from the mat to the springs, potentially resulting in less sensitivity to weight distribution. Observations indicate that the depth of depression created by a jumper can affect jump height and timing, suggesting a non-linear response from the mat. Experimental and analytical approaches can be used to model the dynamics of trampoline performance, including the effects of material properties and external factors like air resistance. The construction of the trampoline bed, whether string or webbed, also plays a crucial role in performance, with competition standards ensuring consistent depression and rebound characteristics. Overall, the choice of mat material and design directly impacts trampoline performance and user experience.
Sherwood Botsford
Messages
91
Reaction score
22
TL;DR Summary
Thoughts on non-linearity, mat characateristics, damped systems.
Trampolines are in effect coupled springs, with the mat being the much softer spring generally.

E.g. On my Acon, when jumping about 1 meter, there is a max cone of depression about 60 cm deep and 1 meter across (1 meter point has a depression of only about 10 cm) At this same point the 160 or so springs are barely moving.

Now, what would be the effect on using some non-stretchy material for the mat. Now all the rebound is coming from the springs. I suspect much higher rebound efficiency. I suspect that the rebound will be less sensitive to weight distribution on your feet, and whether your center of mass is directly over your centre of support.

Some numbers and observations.

I am by far the largest mass i in the system (84 kg) The mat is about 20 kg. The springs about 60 kg, but they move very little. (About 25 cm long including the hooks)

If I do "bunny hops" That is, jump at a level my feet just barely leave the mat, it takes 54 seconds to do 60 hops. Period of 0.9 seconds

If I go for consistent height -- I think somewhere between .7 and 1 meter. (Hey, I'm a beginner) -- then 60 jumps takes 74 seconds.

That 20 extra seconds is .33 seconds per jump. A round trip of .33 seconds corresponds to a height of .4 m. This suggests that I'm already well into the non-linear portion of the mat.

How would I model the dynamics? What else do I need to know to accurately predict height from jumping period?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sherwood Botsford said:
How would I model the dynamics? What else do I need to know to accurately predict height from jumping period?
When in doubt, simplify. Start with the statics.

You could do this experimentally -- how deep is the depression for a series of test masses (or test people) with varying weights?

Or you could do this analytically -- suppose that the mat material obeys Hooke's law. What is the shape of the depression formed when a point mass lies on the surface and the tension at infinity has a particular fixed value? [Feels pretty nasty to me, and I am not convinced that the fabric obeys Hooke's law over the range of expected tensions]. You might need a fabric swatch to subject to two-dimensional stress versus strain testing. Then you could end up with a computational approach.

Dynamics comes in when you need to account for velocity-dependent effects. Air resistance and possible hysteresis in the material.
 
Last edited:
The two main types of high end trampoline beds are string and webbed. Most string beds are "2 string" beds that use pairs of nylon strings, while webbed beds use strips of nylon. Both are very porous with very little aerodynamic drag. There are single string beds, but I don't think they are allowed for competition.



The amount of depression depends on the bed construction. I recall some string beds that didn't depress much, which also shortens the amount of time during compression, requiring more precision. In competitions like the Olympics, the beds are made to some standard, so that the depression distance and time is consistent.

The Acon tramps use a nylon weave bed, intended for outdoor use. I would assume the Acon "air" beds use a more "porous" weave, but from what I can from review videos, they don't look as porous as the higher performance beds.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top