How Does Rotating Polaroid Filters Affect Light Intensity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bowma166
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filters
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the effect of rotating polaroid filters on light intensity. When unpolarized light of intensity I_0 passes through the first polaroid, the intensity drops to I_0/2. The challenge lies in calculating the intensity after the second polaroid, which is rotated by angles φ and α. The relationship I = I_0 cos²(φ) is used, but the geometry of the filter's rotation complicates the calculation. Key observations include that at α = π/2, the intensity remains I = I_0/2, and at α = 0, it is I = (1/2)I_0 cos²(φ).
bowma166
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two sheets of polaroid are aranged as polarized and analyzer. Suppose that the preferential direction of the second sheet is rotated by an angle \phi about the direction of incidence and then rotated by an angle \alpha about the vertical direction. If unpolarized light of intensity I_0 is incident from the left, what is the intensity of the light emerging on the right?
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/8189/polaroiddiagram.jpg
Sorry about the crappy diagram quality.

Homework Equations


I=I_0\cos^2\phi
or
E=E_0\cos\phi

The Attempt at a Solution


Well the intensity drops down to \frac{1}{2}I_0 after the first polaroid. The second one is hard. The way I'm thinking about it, it basically turns into a geometry problem... Say you're looking at the second polaroid head-on from the first direction. It's turned an angle \phi, making the component of the light that can pass through smaller. It's then turned about the vertical axis by an angle \alpha, which, when you look at the 2D projection of the filter you see when you look at it head-on, makes the lines seem more vertical and should allow more light to pass through, right?
Here's my even crappier hand drawn diagram of the situation sort of:
http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/9007/polaroid2.jpg

So, again, I think the problem is: look perpendicularly at the plane made by the top and bottom two vectors in the above diagram when \alpha=0, then rotate it away by \alpha and determine what angle you see the diagonal line makes with the bottom line. Maybe? I just don't know how to do the geometry of that. Sorry for the wordiness and not being very clear, it's hard to express my thoughts on this problem very well.

These points seem clear to me:

at \alpha=\frac{\pi}{2}, I=\frac{1}{2}I_0

at \alpha=0, I=\frac{1}{2}I_0\cos^2\phi

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top