- #1
The Guv.
- 3
- 0
Ok, doing a project at the moment and this is one of the issues I have to overcome;
The information I have researched is as follows:
If this is the case then a 88m diameter rotor should generate 2400kW? But the below diagram from the same page shows a 80m diameter rotor generates 2500kW!
http://www.windpower.org/res/rotorsk.gif
When I put this data into a graph I end up with a curve rather than a straight uniformed line?
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/1328/powergraphmi7.jpg
Can anyone help me understand what I am doing wrong and guide me through what I am meant to be doing?
I'm not doing physics or maths I am doing Arch & Construction Management.
Many thanks!
Exercise: Electricity Generation
Investigate the use of wind generation. The unit provided has a rotor diameter of 3m and an electrical output of 500W at a wind speed of 10.0m/s.
The power output of a wind generator is proportional to the cube of the wind speed.
Instead of relying on one wind generator, calculate the necessary rotor diameter if two smaller wind generators were to be used to provide the same total output.
The information I have researched is as follows:
A typical turbine with a 600 kW electrical generator will typically have a rotor diameter of some 44 metres (144 ft.). If you double the rotor diameter, you get an area which is four times larger (two squared). This means that you also get four times as much power output from the rotor.
Source: http://www.windpower.org/en/tour/wtrb/size.htm
If this is the case then a 88m diameter rotor should generate 2400kW? But the below diagram from the same page shows a 80m diameter rotor generates 2500kW!
http://www.windpower.org/res/rotorsk.gif
When I put this data into a graph I end up with a curve rather than a straight uniformed line?
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/1328/powergraphmi7.jpg
Can anyone help me understand what I am doing wrong and guide me through what I am meant to be doing?
I'm not doing physics or maths I am doing Arch & Construction Management.
Many thanks!
Last edited by a moderator: