How does the amplitude on a EM wave graph correspond to the number of photons?

curiousatlarg
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello all! I am trying to understand ER on a more intuitive level. I can see the relationship between energy and frequency. The relationship between amplitude and photon number is less clear. So far I have E = hf. I understand that the intensity of light is a function of the number of photons. Can this be correlated to amplitude? If so, then how? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What amplitude are you referring to?
 
The intensity of a light beam depends on the number of photons in the light beam; The energy depends on the energy [frequency] of the individual photons.


More here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect
Photoelectric effect
 
curiousatlarg,

I assume by amplitude you mean the magnitude of the electric field, let's call it E. In fact, E is related to the average number of photons via N \sim E^2. Please note also the very important word average. A macroscopic electric field does not correspond to an exact number of photons but instead to something called a coherent state of photons (we can discuss this later if you want).

My claim above can be understood as follows. Let's think about a EM wave of fixed frequency. If you accept that the energy of one photon is h f then the energy of N photons is N h f and the rate of energy flow, which is proportional to the intensity, is I \sim c N h f (c is the speed of light i.e. how fast the photons are going). Now you also know that the intensity is given by I \sim E^2 in a classical EM wave, so by equating these two forms you find that E^2 \sim N up to lots of factors that you can work out or look up somewhere.

Hope this helps.
 
Thanks. I was referring to both the electric and the magnetic fields. What you gave me so far is what I was looking for. I will work with it some.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top