How does the loss of sea ice affect Earth's temperature?

  • Thread starter stuartmacg
  • Start date
In summary, the loss of sea ice contributes to increased Earth temperatures by reducing the planet's albedo effect, which is the reflection of sunlight off bright surfaces. As sea ice melts, darker ocean water is exposed, absorbing more solar energy and raising ocean temperatures. This warming can lead to further ice loss and create a feedback loop that accelerates climate change. Additionally, the reduction of sea ice impacts weather patterns and ecosystems, further influencing global temperatures.
  • #36
Uncovering previously protected sea should allow a bit of radiative heat loss that was not there before, in addition of course to the gain from the absorption of polar sunlight over the same area.
Since the cold polar regions are warmed by fluid transfer from the rest of the globe, they will be above local radiative equilibrium with their polar skies. I would thus expect any increase in thermal connection (reduction in albedo) to increase the heat flow in both directions, increasing the existing net radiative outflow from these regions.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #37
berkeman said:
We don't have any climatologist scientists on our SA staff, unfortunately. That's one reason why we have to take a mostly hands-off approach to Moderation in GW/CC threads (and why we have the rules we do). It's always best if you can find some good references on your own, and post the links to those references to help the discussion along.

One refinement you might try in your Google searching is to confine the results to Google Scholar, which usually returns better search results and more peer-reviewed papers. Let us know what you find. :smile:
missed this post somehow , thanks for the suggestion anyway. I did eventually get one paper on Google Scholar on the topic, posted previously.
Question still unanswered. Have tried Quora a few hours ago - no response yet.
 
  • #38
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
  • #39
After some editing, the thread is reopened.
 
  • #40
stuartmacg said:
Have tried Quora
URL ? (and is an account required to read). I'm curious how an actual climate-science specialist - if one's available and feeling chatty - would choose to answer that.
 
Last edited:
  • #41
stuartmacg said:
Uncovering previously protected sea should allow a bit of radiative heat loss that was not there before, in addition of course to the gain from the absorption of polar sunlight over the same area.
Since the cold polar regions are warmed by fluid transfer from the rest of the globe, they will be above local radiative equilibrium with their polar skies. I would thus expect any increase in thermal connection (reduction in albedo) to increase the heat flow in both directions, increasing the existing net radiative outflow from these regions.
I would argue that the spot where the albedo decreased becomes warmer which allows it to radiate more. At the level of global energy balance, one can define the spot to be the entire planet.
 
Last edited:
  • #42
On reflection I can see there are effects due to the sort of photon maxwell demon operation of the atmosphere (greenhouse) which may justify the positive feedback assertion. Not totally fair to call it that, as its action is symmetrical and the asymmetry in photon energy on each side causes the result.
Thanks to the greenhouse demon, most of the sun's energy arrives unscathed at the surface of the globe, but lower photon energy thermal radiation from the surface is impeded in its journey in the opposite direction.
It is the maxwell demon like effect which breaks the normal expectations of symmetrical effects for radiative coupling.
For this reason a newly uncovered patch of thermally black sea will eat sunlight when it shines, but cannot radiate out much of its heat directly. It will heat the local atmosphere by IR emission and by contact night and day and winter and summer, since it will be around 0C and the atmosphere will be much colder. This heated atmosphere will to some extent pass on the heat to space (presumably a linear effect), and the heat loss from the sea's surface will increase sea convection and global cooling.

The net effect will be difficult to analyze and quantify and may easily lead to mistaken conclusions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #43
It's an interesting discussion. I did manage to find a paper that appears to confirm the idea that the loss of ice actually increases cooling.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967064599000284

It also appears that the loss of ice will have little effect on the protection offered by the albedo effect, which because of the low amount of energy the poles receive has a negligible effect on climate.

https://blogs.cuit.columbia.edu/dmw2158/solar-radiation-the-earths-energy-balance/
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
7K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
53
Views
12K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
8K
Back
Top