How Does the Work-Energy Theorem Determine the Initial Speed of a Sledgehammer?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the initial speed of a sledgehammer using the work-energy theorem, given that 490 J of work is done on it. The equation used is (Fnet)(d) = (0.5)(m)(velocity final^2 - velocity initial^2). The user encounters confusion with the negative value for initial velocity when solving the equation, leading to questions about the direction of forces and work done. Clarification is provided that the net force on the hammer acts upwards against its downward displacement, indicating negative work done on the hammer. Ultimately, the correct initial speed of the sledgehammer is confirmed to be 14 m/s.
aishax
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



490 J of work is done on a pin when a 5 kg sledgehammer strikes it (bringing the sledgehammer to rest). What is the initial speed of the sledge hammer.


Homework Equations



(Fnet)(d)= (0.5)(m)(velocity final^2 - velocity initial^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



490 = (0.5)(5)(0^2 - v inital^2)
980 = 5 (-v initial^2)
196 = - v initial^2


Problem is, v initial is now negative, and to get rid of the negative, I'd have to divide both sides by -1. But then it would be -196, and I would not be able to square root that. The answer is already given, and it is 14 m/s. It's just that one problem that has me stuck.

Help much appreciated :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The net force on the pin acts upward, and the displacemnt is downward, so the total work done of 490 J is positive or negative?
 
It would be negative.
But how is the net force on the pin acting upwards?
 
aishax said:
It would be negative.
But how is the net force on the pin acting upwards?

I think PhantomJay meant that the net force on the hammer is upwards, which is opposite to its displacement (hence the negative work done on the hammer and negative change in its kinetic energy).
 
Ahh, okay. That makes sense.
Thank you! :)
 
cepheid said:
I think PhantomJay meant that the net force on the hammer is upwards
Yes, thanks for the correction.
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top