How Does Total Internal Reflection Occur in Salt Solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anton Alice
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of a laser beam passing through a salt solution with a gradient in refractive index. The laser bends clockwise as it moves through layers of varying refractive indices, raising questions about how it bends downward again and the presence of reflections at high-to-low index transitions. It is suggested that total internal reflection at the peak of the curve contributes to this downward bending. Additionally, as the refractive index difference approaches zero, transmission becomes more significant than reflection, despite the potential for total internal reflection. The trajectory of the beam can be accurately described using Snell's law and differential equations.
Anton Alice
Messages
68
Reaction score
1
Hello,

please take a look at the following picture:
laser.png


So we have a salt solution, with increasing refractive index, as you go down the solution.
The Laser is steadily refracted at the layers from high-to-low index and therefore bends in clockwise direction.
But how is it possible for the laser to bend down again? And also, shouldn't we also see reflections? Because at any point, there is a layer of high-to-low index transition. And at any such point there should also be a reflection. And as the angle of incidence get higher, as the laser path gets more horizontal, the reflection should dominate.

EDIT:

Does it bend down, because of total internal reflection at the peak of the curve?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the index of refraction changes continuously, you have to use Snell's law to describe the propagation one infinitesimal distance at a time. If you work it out, you can get a differential equation that will describe the trajectory of a beam of light. That it bends back downwards at the top is due to total internal reflection.

That being said, as the difference in index of refraction on two sides of an interface goes to zero, transmission dominates over reflection (the reflection coefficient becomes insignificant compared to the transmission coefficient). Though this would seem to contradict the idea of total internal reflection causing the backwards bend at the top, the beam near the top has a very shallow angle of incidence on either side of the peak, so that very small differences in refractive index can still amount to a change in the beam's trajectory.
 
  • Like
Likes Anton Alice
yes, thank you.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top