How Effective Are Proof Books for Students New to Abstract Algebra?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of two mathematical texts, "How to Prove It: A Structured Approach" by Daniel Velleman and "Introduction to Mathematical Thinking: Algebra and Number Systems" by Gilbert and Vanstone, in preparing students for advanced courses like abstract algebra. It highlights that preparation may vary based on individual school curricula, noting that some institutions require an introductory proofs class, while others, like MIT, do not. Velleman's book is praised for its comprehensive approach to proofs, with a focus on logic and problem-solving, making it a valuable resource for undergraduates. However, some participants suggest that learning proofs in the context of specific mathematical subjects, such as analysis, may be more engaging and effective. Overall, while Velleman's book is recommended, the sufficiency of these texts for specific courses remains uncertain.
IKonquer
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Has anyone read How to Prove It: A Structured Approach by Daniel Velleman or Introduction to Mathematical Thinking: Algebra and Number Systems by Gilbert and Vanstone?

If so, how well do they prepare a student who has had no exposure to proofs to take classes such as abstract algebra?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this will largely depend on how your school approaches the course. I know that my school has what is essentially an intro to proofs class which all students must take before moving on to any pure math such as this, or real analysis, or anything of the sort.

I do know, however, that MIT does not have such a course, and that the only prerequisite for real analysis (a proof based course) is the normal old calculus I and II sequence. Their course (in theory) gives all of the proof-knowledge needed for the course.

That being said, I don't think you can go wrong with Velleman's How To Prove It. I am reading it right now, and it is great.

Check out the comments on amazon, too.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521675995/?tag=pfamazon01-20

From what everyone says over there it is a great buy and a great asset to an undergrad mathematics student. (This is ultimately the reason I took a chance on it -- and no matter what, it can't hurt. The book is about 400 pages of all proofs, and how to go about solving proofs, and solutions selected proofs. The first two chapters are introductions to some basic math logic stuff, the "language" of proofs, but everything else is proofs. If you go through the whole book, and work the problems, you will most definitely get something substantial out of it.).

Now, whether or not this will be sufficient for your course, I cannot say; for that you will need someone with more experience than I.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I took a proofs course and have a number of proofs books and I found them all kind of boring.

I think it is more interesting to learn proofs while learning a specific math subject.

For example, Analysis with an Introduction to Proofs by Steven Lay appears to be a good book.

I'm sure something similar exists for abstract algebra.
 
This thread only works as a summary from the original source: List of STEM Masterworks in Physics, Mechanics, Electrodynamics... The original thread got very long and somewhat hard to read so I have compiled the recommendations from that thread in an online (Google Drive) spreadsheet. SUMMARY Permits are granted so you can make comments on the spreadsheet but I'll initially be the only one capable of edition. This is to avoid the possibility of someone deleting everything either by mistake...
By looking around, it seems like Dr. Hassani's books are great for studying "mathematical methods for the physicist/engineer." One is for the beginner physicist [Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields] and the other is [Mathematical Physics: A Modern Introduction to Its Foundations] for the advanced undergraduate / grad student. I'm a sophomore undergrad and I have taken up the standard calculus sequence (~3sems) and ODEs. I want to self study ahead in mathematics...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top